I think it's more like through building 80 and over building 75Looking between the projected layout and these latest theming plans, are we going to be crashing through Building 75? A near-miss element like that would almost be worth the lack of swinging.
Building 80 is only 12 tallJust found on FB ........... New details of the 2025 Rollercoaster and its theming buildings and 2-dimensional structures. Lots of landscaping is being added as well.
View attachment 31780
Building 75 is 30 feet tallJust found on FB ........... New details of the 2025 Rollercoaster and its theming buildings and 2-dimensional structures. Lots of landscaping is being added as well.
View attachment 31780
Gives us bbw vibes for sureJust found on FB ........... New details of the 2025 Rollercoaster and its theming buildings and 2-dimensional structures. Lots of landscaping is being added as well.
View attachment 31780
Building 80 is only 12 tall
Building 75 is 30 feet tall
Gives us bbw vibes for sure
I'm increasingly convinced that the park is actually going to make this into something pretty nice. There's a confluence right now between an increased focus on aesthetics within the chain, an increasing amount of investment into theming by BGW, and what is likely to be a significant influx of discretionary budget provided to BGW to capitalize on their 50th anniversary.
I just sincerely worry that no matter how much money and effort they put in, it's bound to be wasted. No matter how nice they make the attraction, the scale of the attraction and its placement are just so incredibly, fundamentally, and in my opinion, nearly irreconcilably, mismatched. Without neighboring, imminent, enormous, and, in my assessment, somewhat unlikely, expansion plans to quickly follow Holzfäller, I believe this coaster is doomed to miniscule ridership within 12 months of its debut. I just don't see how a small family invert in the middle of nowhere isn't doomed to inevitable obscurity.
And then, of course, the investment will be seen as a failure—and who knows what lessons the chain will take from that...
Well said. I, too, severely hope they have something HUGE to immediately follow it, but I'm not hopeful. Then, on top of that, directly competing with Kings Dominion who will be installing a much more prominent ride, and also possibly debuting TWO full rethemes of existing coasters... I would not want to be the person that canned the 220ft RMC in favor of this.I just sincerely worry that no matter how much money and effort they put in, it's bound to be wasted. No matter how nice they make the attraction, the scale of the attraction and its placement are just so incredibly, fundamentally, and in my opinion, nearly irreconcilably, mismatched. Without neighboring, imminent, enormous, and, in my assessment, somewhat unlikely, expansion plans to quickly follow Holzfäller, I believe this coaster is doomed to miniscule ridership within 12 months of its debut. I just don't see how a small family invert in the middle of nowhere isn't doomed to inevitable obscurity.
And then, of course, the investment will be seen as a failure—and who knows what lessons the chain will take from that...
Could easily end up like I305, where it's perceived as a great ride and ridership/lines don't match at all because of location.I'm increasingly convinced that the park is actually going to make this into something pretty nice. There's a confluence right now between an increased focus on aesthetics within the chain, an increasing amount of investment into theming by BGW, and what is likely to be a significant influx of discretionary budget provided to BGW to capitalize on their 50th anniversary.
I just sincerely worry that no matter how much money and effort they put in, it's bound to be wasted. No matter how nice they make the attraction, the scale of the attraction and its placement are just so incredibly, fundamentally, and in my opinion, nearly irreconcilably, mismatched. Without neighboring, imminent, enormous, and, in my assessment, somewhat unlikely, expansion plans to quickly follow Holzfäller, I believe this coaster is doomed to miniscule ridership within 12 months of its debut. I just don't see how a small family invert in the middle of nowhere isn't doomed to inevitable obscurity.
And then, of course, the investment will be seen as a failure—and who knows what lessons the chain will take from that...
I'm actually not that surprised. Sure, SeaWorld is spending money chainwide on new attractions, but it is becoming increasing evident that SWO and BGT are going to see the biggest lift from this spending, and rightfully so with Epic Universe opening up in 2025.I can't believe that this ride went from something thrilling to the ride SpongeBob and Patrick rode in the one episode with the tiny ass hill in the middle.
I think you may overestimate how much the GP cares about BBWI think if they do indeed go with a nice Big Bad Wolf homage, the nostalgia appeal will be more than enough to draw crowds back to that "obscure" area of the park. People affectionately talk about BBW all the time. If Busch does this right, it will be a smash hit among the general public. It still hurts that we almost had a Gwazi 2.0 lurking back there... but let's trust the process and hope that the park has another area in mind for something of that caliber.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.