Project 2025/Holzfäller: Big Bad Wolf 2 (B&M Family Invert)

Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Status
Not open for further replies.
had to break out the pfn account for this one…
i believe is see eight rows?
a lot of these footer placements look wildly unlike anything that doesn’t have inverting transitions (similar to new gen rmc/intamin) if i had a gun to my head i wanna say some sort of new gen intamin mega/giga? or a t.rex
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mwe BGW, Fiender, Coasternerd and 2 others
matthewcsoup said:
had to break out the pfn account for this one…
i believe is see eight rows?
a lot of these footer placements look wildly unlike anything that doesn’t have inverting transitions (similar to new gen rmc/intamin) if i had a gun to my head i wanna say some sort of new gen intamin mega/giga? or a t.rex
Click to expand...
Hmm...

Are the placements comparable to a Mack? Say - Ride to Happiness?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coasternerd and matthewcsoup
Just having some some dirty measurements involving final brakes to first turn post lift hill I don't believe this is a B&M giga. The footers are also shorter than the front to back of I305's plot so I'm not thinking a giga we've seen before if for some reason it is a giga.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mwe BGW, Fiender, Coasternerd and 3 others
Based on the foundations, it doesn't seem to be Intamin or RMC. They do seem similar to Manta and Copperhead Strike so I'm wondering if it's a Mack.
The Xtreme spinners have used circular foundations compared to other projects though, so I don't know its that. I also don't see launch segments and both Xtreme spinners have used launches.
Doesn't seem to have a ton of elevation either...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mwe BGW, Fiender and Coasternerd
Keep in mind, I don't think this plan has the exact footer design, nor would I put too much stock into debating the shape. Almost all of the time, there are large square/rectangular pads poured underground to anchor the actual square/circular "footer", which is covered over with dirt, so only the top of the "footer" is showing above ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DE_Creative, Nicole, John and 4 others
BGWfan said:
Based on the foundations, it doesn't seem to be Intamin or RMC. They do seem similar to Manta and Copperhead Strike so I'm wondering if it's a Mack.
The Xtreme spinners have used circular foundations compared to other projects though, so I don't know its that. I also don't see launch segments and both Xtreme spinners have used launches.
Doesn't seem to have a ton of elevation either...
Click to expand...

drachen fire flying coaster confirmed!
 
Interesting that the rumored wing coaster at KD is gonna open the same year as this coaster (theoretically)

Also, with Seaworld working with B&M as much as they have been recently; especially with BGT and their family invert, I wonder if they are on this project…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coasternerd, cdchen83 and Python_Survivor
Bold prediction: B&M family invert sister coaster to BGT

-footer spread makes it seem not very high
-doesn't seem to have a significant straight launch section
-tight turns
-seems to have a curved drop over the maintenance building (curved drops being typical invert behavior)
 
Last edited:
  • Dislike
  • Sad
  • Wow
Reactions: jwf, Mwe BGW, Mushroom and 5 others
BGWfan said:
Bold prediction: B&M family invert sister coaster to BGT

-footer spread makes it seem not very high
-doesn't seem to have a significant straight launch section
-tight turns
-seems to have a curved drop over the maintenance station (curved drops being typical invert behavior)
Click to expand...

b1b.jpg

Disclaimer: This is a meme. Analysis is far from complete. Time to start managing expectations though.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: Greggles, Bring Back Questor 87, MikePat and 13 others
BGWfan said:
Bold prediction: B&M family invert sister coaster to BGT

-footer spread makes it seem not very high
-doesn't seem to have a significant straight launch section
-tight turns
-seems to have a curved drop over the maintenance station (curved drops being typical invert behavior)
Click to expand...
If this is the case, my excitement is at a zero.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YachtyLogs, jwf, DolphinzRock and 8 others
Danrar said:
There should be enough here to estimate track length to some degree.

That'll definitely set the expectations for the scale of this.
Click to expand...
The overhead footprint (no elevation change) is about 2500' considering the possible layout above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiender
Status
Not open for further replies.
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad