Project 2025/Holzfäller: Big Bad Wolf 2 (B&M Family Invert)
- Thread starter Zachary
- Start date
- Status
Watch it be a Maurer Spike that BGW charges $20/ride like Carnival does
Depending on who you ask, and how pedantic they are, that would be Kings Island.
Are you saying that cause you don’t want it to be? or do you have evidence that suggests otherwise?
Honestly I'm not aware of it at the moment but it really isnt hard to rule out between the current cost of steel, and the cost of a Mack vs. the budget the parks are getting recently. Mack would blow that out of the water.
Remember:
BGT has had immense success with Iron Gwazi.
BGW did InvadR as a test case for the solely wood concept, has worked mostly fine.
Hybrid concept works even better, and will draw crowds as it has for BGT.
KD has an RMC, albeit smaller than this, so the competition case works well here.
If BGW does this, they will have the tallest RMC in the world, eclipsing Cedar Point, etc.
RMC of a dragon theme is most logical at this juncture. Discussion of anything else can likely end there, and continue from this standpoint.
BGT has had immense success with Iron Gwazi.
BGW did InvadR as a test case for the solely wood concept, has worked mostly fine.
Hybrid concept works even better, and will draw crowds as it has for BGT.
KD has an RMC, albeit smaller than this, so the competition case works well here.
If BGW does this, they will have the tallest RMC in the world, eclipsing Cedar Point, etc.
RMC of a dragon theme is most logical at this juncture. Discussion of anything else can likely end there, and continue from this standpoint.
Technically, Griffon is. But technical speak doesn't market rides.
My favorite hobby on this forum recently is watching the sheer amount of skepticism directed towards Unagi.
Don't get me wrong it is good to be skeptical of people saying things without proof, but I have never seen someone get questioned every single time they speak like this and it is HILARIOUS to watch. I am going to start questioning everything Zach says to go with the theme.
Don't get me wrong it is good to be skeptical of people saying things without proof, but I have never seen someone get questioned every single time they speak like this and it is HILARIOUS to watch. I am going to start questioning everything Zach says to go with the theme.
I'd rather everyone have healthy skepticism of information and use the mod vetting process if the person who provides (or confirms) information that parks haven't yet made public doesn't either make it clear they have connections to reliable insider sources (even if it's themselves but they cannot disclose) or use the mod vetting process so as to independently attempt to validate the data without disclosing any sources.
I don't see why that's not particularly reasonable
I don't see why that's not particularly reasonable
While I don't have any issue with what you are saying I personally find the level of skepticism and the way it's being expressed in relation to Unagi a little puzzling as he seems to have a fairly good track record on what he has said.
Typically I see initial skepticism, some vouching from administrative personnel or just a track record explanation, and then skepticism goes away. But with Unagi it is comedic levels of "lol prove it".
Maybe the solution is a ParkFans verified check for people considered credible, would love to see the power abuse that results from that.
Maybe the solution is a ParkFans verified check for people considered credible, would love to see the power abuse that results from that.
To be clear, Unagi has long-since established credibility with the Admins (and I thought the community). That doesn’t mean we are providing a blanket sign-off for his information, but knee-jerk skepticism isn’t reasonable either.
Last edited:
- Status