Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Status
Not open for further replies.
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

horsesboy said:
warfelg said:
horsesboy said:
Correct the height waver is how high above the ground it is.  If its 315 above the peak over the Rhine it could drop down toward the river adding possibly 60 feet or so to the drop height witgout violating the 315 height waver.  So the drop could possibly be around 370-380 if they pushed it to almost water level.

You're still missing the point.  I think he wasn't asking about the drop.  I think he was asking since the waiver says 315 above ground level, do they have to go 315 or can they go say 305.

No 315 is the max height they are not required to build to that but they could have requested a lower waver so its likely going to be really close to that height.

I wouldn't disagree, usually it ends up within 5-10 feet. But that's what I took the question of. Does it have to be 315, or can it come in under.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jornor
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

Probably will be 315 feet for advertising purposes.

Also got an interesting message.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1207.JPG
    IMG_1207.JPG
    126.8 KB · Views: 126
  • Like
Reactions: jornor
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

And if anyone needed to see just how incestuous the sourcing of all of this "information" is, this, my friends, illustrates it perfectly.

MadridBot said:
madmax said:
Also got an interesting message.

Where did you get that... I took that exact screenshot..

A bunch of people are sitting around chatting about completely unevidenced claims on Instagram like they're fact and then proceeding to "leak" it to each other in this huge, fragmented, disjointed circlejerk of people who all claim to be in the know. It's absolutely mindnumbing. It's to the point where even if there was, once, an ounce of truth behind it, it is now impossible to verify anything because of the gigantic game of telephone.

Like always, to any of you people involved in this mess: Message me with evidence and we'll chat ad nauseum. The claims without data or solid sourcing are worthless though.




UPDATE: MadridBot deleted the post I quoted above. That said, above is a direct quote of what was originally said, preserved for posterity. Again, I'm not looking to publicly crucify MadridBot, I have vouched for his character repeatedly in this thread and I don't regret doing so. That said, now that other people are randomly coming out of the woodwork claiming the same, people need to know that it's all circular.
 
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

MadridBot said:
madmax said:
Probably will be 315 feet for advertising purposes.

Also got an interesting message.

Where did you get that... I took that exact screenshot..

From you (assuming you're cww_1).
 
  • Like
Reactions: jornor
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

BTW I say B&M giga because one, it fits the terrain and height waver, two, BGW likes them and has some bad blood with Intamin.

Other 20% is a Starflyer and new land.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jornor
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

It appears that there may be some circular reporting going on.  I found a good explanation of the phenomenon on Wikipedia.  Here is a portion of the article:

Wikipedia said:
Circular reporting or false confirmation is a situation in source criticism where a piece of information appears to come from multiple independent sources, but in reality comes from only one source. In many cases, the problem happens mistakenly through sloppy intelligence gathering practices. However, at other times the situation can be intentionally caused by the original source.

This problem occurs in a variety of fields, including intelligence gathering, journalism, and scholarly research. It is of particular concern in military intelligence because the original source has a higher likelihood of wanting to pass on misinformation, and because the chain of reporting is more prone to being obscured. The case of the 2002 Niger uranium forgeries was a classic instance of circular reporting by intelligence agencies.
 
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

MadridBot said:
ApolloSeat33 said:
Isn't anyone else having a hard time picturing a lift hill that stretches ALL the way from the DF station to the "max height" point? On the horizontal axis that's like ~1350 feet away... by comparison, Fury 325 has a lift hill that's only like 425 feet horizontally...

The rumor is that this won’t be a chain lift, but an lsm launch. I don’t know though.

Yes, I was specifically referring to the people waxing poetic about 300' B&M floorless loopers or traditional gigas or whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jornor
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

Pretzel Kaiser said:
At this point I want it to be a Star flyer because of insane this thread has become.

It's also clearly going to be called "Toro: The Blast Coaster".

I feel like measuring out the area that has had markers and drillings vs some of the biggest roller coasters and hamlets.

In my concept thread I measured out Fiesta field and it was almost the same size as Festa Italia. I don't think people are grasping just how big the area from Drachen station to the high point is.

A few theories for me:
~The soil drilling is to make sure the conduit that they are laying won't hit any old DF footers, won't hit and soft spots, and won't hit bedrock. Without knowing exactly where each hole is drilled I wouldn't 100% conclude it's footer work because we know electrical work is going on back there too.

~The station will overlook the river if they want the lift hill to cross in order to make the lift look more dramatic, has a quick turnaround, comes back for a twister style layout. Thinking Titan style coaster.

~This isn't a coaster, and they are doing all the drill just because they are there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jornor
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

Overlaying other rides' layouts onto the current field/park areas of BGW in Google Maps or (if you're weird) Bing Maps gives a pretty good feel for the size of the collective space they have available there vs. space needs for a big coaster.

I recall that we went through that exercise many pages back... What I learned from it is that the available space is big, but 300+ foot coasters tend to be absolutely sprawling in their space needs. Even twister layouts like I305 occupy a Herculean footprint. The space goes quickly.

That said... a fast ride with a lot of high points might make for plenty of room beneath/alongside. Hamlet acreage?

I don't really buy the idea that a conventional lift would start anywhere near the old DF station and peak over at a precipice of Festa field. Seems like an unnecessarily complex and generally sub-optimal use of that big space. The Rhine view would be totally dominated by a long-span uber-rainbow of lift and drop, which wouldn't make great use of the topography...
 
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

halfabee said:
I don't really buy the idea that a conventional lift would start anywhere near the old DF station and peak over at a precipice of Festa field. Seems like an unnecessarily complex and generally sub-optimal use of that big space.

I don't see that either. [Assuming any relation to the water,] the Rhine is for a drop, not a lift hill. That's also extra height and complexity to construct tall supports over the water. I don't know where the lift hill will rise, but over the water isn't it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jornor
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

halfabee said:
Overlaying other rides' layouts onto the current field/park areas of BGW in Google Maps or (if you're weird) Bing Maps gives a pretty good feel for the size of the collective space they have available there vs. space needs for a big coaster.

I recall that we went through that exercise many pages back... What I learned from it is that the available space is big, but 300+ foot coasters tend to be absolutely sprawling in their space needs.  Even twister layouts like I305 occupy a Herculean footprint.  The space goes quickly.

That said... a fast ride with a lot of high points might make for plenty of room beneath/alongside.  Hamlet acreage?

I don't really buy the idea that a conventional lift would start anywhere near the old DF station and peak over at a precipice of Festa field.  Seems like an unnecessarily complex and generally sub-optimal use of that big space.  The Rhine view would be totally dominated by a long-span uber-rainbow of lift and drop, which wouldn't make great use of the topography...

I did it for lift hills but not overall ride. I think what tends to make them "Sprawling" is that many Giga's are out and back. I-305 is one of the few twisters, with MF being a strange T shape.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jornor
RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?

The speculation for this new coaster is going to drive the coaster enthusiasts of Virginia insane. Hopefully it all plays out to be something amazing!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jornor and Merboy
Status
Not open for further replies.
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad