Bring Back Questor 87 said:My coaster-senses have been tingling in a strangely simple yet potentially awesome direction as of late. One thing we haven’t seen from B&M in some time has been their good old-fashioned Sitting Coaster. I know the thought may be “what about Hulk?” - but that was a revamp of a 1999 concept. Using the restraint style from their latest Wing or inverted styles and combining a 300Ft height, possibly having an inversion, length, or speed record would be big for the park. It would be a reliable choice that could have some amazing inversion potential. Additionally, Kumba at BGT is still a relatively great example and it’s a 1993 build. Imagine what the park could do with a 2019 tech, multi-inversion B&M that has a proven history with installations across the globe.
Not to mention their Sitting Coaster howls and roars beautifully at speed, and that sound across the Rhine would be incredible.
Or this is the nicest pedestrian bridge in history.
Bring Back Questor 87 said:Correct me if I’m wrong, 315 feet is the waiver, it doesn’t have to be that high, right? Whatever this is could be like Alpengeist that is 195ft tall and drops 170.
madmax said:80% chance this is a B&M giga
Bring Back Questor 87 said:Correct me if I’m wrong, 315 feet is the waiver, it doesn’t have to be that high, right? Whatever this is could be like Alpengeist that is 195ft tall and drops 170.
Bring Back Questor 87 said:My coaster-senses have been tingling in a strangely simple yet potentially awesome direction as of late. One thing we haven’t seen from B&M in some time has been their good old-fashioned Sitting Coaster. I know the thought may be “what about Hulk?” - but that was a revamp of a 1999 concept. Using the restraint style from their latest Wing or inverted styles and combining a 300Ft height, possibly having an inversion, length, or speed record would be big for the park. It would be a reliable choice that could have some amazing inversion potential. Additionally, Kumba at BGT is still a relatively great example and it’s a 1993 build. Imagine what the park could do with a 2019 tech, multi-inversion B&M that has a proven history with installations across the globe.
Bring Back Questor 87 said:Not to mention their Sitting Coaster howls and roars beautifully at speed, and that sound across the Rhine would be incredible.
Bring Back Questor 87 said:Correct me if I’m wrong, 315 feet is the waiver, it doesn’t have to be that high, right? Whatever this is could be like Alpengeist that is 195ft tall and drops 170.
horsesboy said:Bring Back Questor 87 said:Correct me if I’m wrong, 315 feet is the waiver, it doesn’t have to be that high, right? Whatever this is could be like Alpengeist that is 195ft tall and drops 170.
That true but it could also be like Apollo and Invadr and drop down hill increasing the drop height but keeping it umder the height above grade thst the waiver if for.
horsesboy said:Bring Back Questor 87 said:Correct me if I’m wrong, 315 feet is the waiver, it doesn’t have to be that high, right? Whatever this is could be like Alpengeist that is 195ft tall and drops 170.
That true but it could also be like Apollo and Invadr and drop down hill increasing the drop height but keeping it umder the height above grade thst the waiver if for.
warfelg said:horsesboy said:Bring Back Questor 87 said:Correct me if I’m wrong, 315 feet is the waiver, it doesn’t have to be that high, right? Whatever this is could be like Alpengeist that is 195ft tall and drops 170.
That true but it could also be like Apollo and Invadr and drop down hill increasing the drop height but keeping it umder the height above grade thst the waiver if for.
I think he's talking about just because the waiver says 315 does it mean the top height is 315.
horsesboy said:Correct the height waver is how high above the ground it is. If its 315 above the peak over the Rhine it could drop down toward the river adding possibly 60 feet or so to the drop height witgout violating the 315 height waver. So the drop could possibly be around 370-380 if they pushed it to almost water level.
warfelg said:horsesboy said:Correct the height waver is how high above the ground it is. If its 315 above the peak over the Rhine it could drop down toward the river adding possibly 60 feet or so to the drop height witgout violating the 315 height waver. So the drop could possibly be around 370-380 if they pushed it to almost water level.
You're still missing the point. I think he wasn't asking about the drop. I think he was asking since the waiver says 315 above ground level, do they have to go 315 or can they go say 305.
ApolloSeat33 said:Isn't anyone else having a hard time picturing a lift hill that stretches ALL the way from the DF station to the "max height" point? On the horizontal axis that's like ~1350 feet away... by comparison, Fury 325 has a lift hill that's only like 425 feet horizontally...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.