Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Status
Not open for further replies.
The purpose of marketing is not to inform enthusiasts. It is to get everyone else exited enough to plan trips (before and after) and possibly buy passes.
I literally saw an enthusiast suggest on X-Tweeter that WOF decided not to open Zambezi Zinger when scheduled.............to avoid competing with Wildcat's Revenge opening that week. Hersheypark is 1,039 miles from Worlds of Fun and therefore Kansas City where I assume 75% of the parks clientele reside.
 
I agree that the step up transitions before the brake run before the tunnel and the 2nd lift are also janky. It would be nice if those were changed to longer, smooth transitions.
I know it's not possible without a major rework, but it would be nice if there was a way to eliminate the chain lift there completely.
 
Launched Nessie but the launch is just a super short LSM section where that lift was. The other lift is still a chain. The world isn’t ready.
A lift hill and a launch, and all on Arrow style track? Memories of RollerCoaster Tycoon 1 come flooding back.

I had to look it up and the Arrow/Vekoma style "Corkscrew Roller Coaster" only had booster (launch) pieces in RCT1, not in 2 or Classic.

I have a feeling this post was facetious, but it would also be very marketable, helping contribute towards BGW having the most launches in a single park.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mwe BGW
IIRC, the jankiness of the transition from helix to lift 2 isn't just because of Arrow's hand-bent track and their lack of heartlining.

Instead, it's between the train not being able to get high enough for the necessary momentum to return to the station after the second loop that there's a lift here, and there's a short trim brake section right before the lift to ensure the train is able to properly engage the lift chain.

However, for whatever reasons probably related to inertia and limits of ride layout designs at the time (probably including conditions related to building over the pipeline easement), the helix ends at a lower elevation than the base of the lift and requires a sudden upwards transition to the higher elevation for the trim to lift section.

Given modern techniques, I could see this changed to either a different lift angle to start at the same elevation as the end of the helix, or a more gradual incline with some form of propulsion to eliminate issues with the inevitable valleying.
 
Last edited:
Hi -- long time listener, long time caller. I have a probability question.

Might the "Description" field reading "Loch Ness Mountain Steel Repair" suggest this is little more than once-per-generation heavy structural maintenance, bringing relatively change to the ride experience?

Or is it more likely that the phrase is deliberately obscure to hide a substantially different scope of work?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coasternerd
Hi -- long time listener, long time caller. I have a probability question.

Might the "Description" field reading "Loch Ness Mountain Steel Repair" suggest this is little more than once-per-generation heavy structural maintenance, bringing relatively change to the ride experience?

Or is it more likely that the phrase is deliberately obscure to hide a substantially different scope of work?
I have a feeling, since just saying "Steel Repair" is pretty vague, then we could see something bigger. But I could be wrong.
 
To me it seems borderline impossible to replace the track inside of the cave without some major cave wall removal, so I could understand rebuilding it from new. Equally, could be just a careful disassemble/reassemble process, depending how close it is to the pipeline clearing & new construction limits.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad