I want to better clarify my stance. Some of my wording didn't properly reflect what I actually mean, and I want to make sure I’m being fair to people who legitimately rely on these programs.
Some examples I brought up in the quoted message earlier were very specific, situational scenarios based on specific incidents I've seen, and I definitely didn't mean to portray everyone using accommodations in that light. I know every situation is different, and I shouldn't have generalized.
First off: If you have a disability or medical need, visible or invisible, you should absolutely use the accommodations. Navigating a park with physical limitations, chronic pain, or neurodivergence is hard, and virtual queue systems exist for a vital reason: to create equal access so everyone can enjoy their day.
My issue isn't with anyone who actually needs the system. It comes from my firsthand experience working at several theme parks.
Having worked in the industry, I’ve seen people straight up lie to game the honor system just to get a free fast lane, especially enthusiasts trying to pad their ride counts. An example of abuse is when someone gets a return time for Twisted Timbers because they claim they can't wait in a queue, but then proceed to march across the park and ride three other attractions waiting in the standby lines while their timer runs down. That isn't using the system for equity, it's double-dipping and exploiting a program meant for accessibility.
When bad actors abuse these systems, it forces parks to tighten restrictions, which ultimately hurts the guests who genuinely need the help.
I know that standing still in a line is completely different from walking around, and that invisible disabilities vary a lot. My frustration is purely with people intentionally taking advantage of the system, not with the guests it was built to support.