acrossdapark said:No interest at all. Further based on SEAS loans and liabilities that exceed the entire value of the park system by nearly $500M. Who's going to loan them money to build this?
Sure they have some operating capital, but if they spend that they essentially downgrade the stock and their ability to make payments on their liabilities to a point no one will continue loaning money when needed.
I mean seriously, they took issue at the financial aspects of keeping Darkastle open while adding a new VR ride. Does anyone honestly think they can handle this without reallocating park resources to keep something like this running when they can't even fully staff the current parks...
Not only the financial aspects of it all, SEAS needs to overall improve their management, parks, marketing and the perception of the system before they go expanding or spending money needlessly.
I could absolutely be wrong. In my opinion, the new SP park is a contractual agreement. Sesame Workshop wants another park. SEAS wants to keep the IP. To keep it, Sesame Workshop says they have to build a second Sesame Place. SEAS agrees because they have so much invested in EVERY park and needs to keep the IP. It'd be expensive removing all references when all but one park has themed rides, lands, signage, characters, etc..
Again could be totally wrong. This is simply my opinion on why SEAS is moving this new park.