Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Roaring Rapids' existence is more debatable, it's a huge parcel of land that would be perfect for literally anything else except there's little else other than a rapids that would be able to go there without pissing off neighbors (regardless of what zoning says). They run it because there's no better ideas on the table right now.

Don't even dream about the two log flumes being removed though, they're both ridiculously popular and extremely high capacity. Even with a combined 2500 pph throughput or something like that they're still susceptible to hour-plus lines even in the evenings. It's just not happening.
Sorry to bump this thread, but if you ask me, a full refurb/renovation of Roaring Rapids would be of use for this park. It’s notoriously unreliable and could definitely use an upgrade,

Maybe make it longer, add more water features or like a drop or something (similar to Infinity Falls or Mystic River Falls)
 
  • Love
Reactions: TPoseOnTantrum
It really is fascinating that Six Flags is taking the plunge and not going with an IP on this addition. It is like a mix of Timbertown at Great Escape, Camp Snoopy, and Wildwood Grove at Dollywood. I wonder if this is like a test location to see how they might move forward with IP in the chain in the future. I'm really thinking Six Flags Over Georgia could get this next, as a new kids area with no IP mentioned was part of a survey for that park.

I can already envision Six Flags selling Squishmallows of all the forest animals on that Trail Trotters ride, plus the Bee Boppin Bees and the Sky Hawk.
 
It really is fascinating that Six Flags is taking the plunge and not going with an IP on this addition. It is like a mix of Timbertown at Great Escape, Camp Snoopy, and Wildwood Grove at Dollywood. I wonder if this is like a test location to see how they might move forward with IP in the chain in the future. I'm really thinking Six Flags Over Georgia could get this next, as a new kids area with no IP mentioned was part of a survey for that park.
Agreed and I think it helps that this is re-doing an area and keeping a lot of what is around it (Logger's Run, Little Dipper, Sprocket Rockets) instead of wholesale replacing stuff. I'd like to see more of this kind of approach, which is helped by not being solely about IP for kids/cartoon rides.
 
The park president was asked why there is no IP.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Direct Link to Embedded Media Source


The response is interesting. The park president is a fan of Snoopy. And Bugs Bunny always has a place at Great America. And maybe they could add the characters later?
Very interesting...

So legacy Six Flags parks may not have access to the Snoopy IP yet after all? At least while they have Looney Toons?

Seems like a pretty major development...

Things seem so confusing with Six Flags and Snoopy right now. The Six Flags Merchandise website has Snoopy merch but no Legacy Six Flags parks and no Looney Tunes items.

Six Flags Merchandise
 
There were two aerial views of the new land in the media kit. I've only seen the first one on the Six Flags blog post so far today. The second angle does a good job showing off the former Camp Cartoon. Love that a Moose on the Loose style ride is going where all the former rides were. Six Flags knocked this expansion out of the park. Can't wait to see more stuff like this come to other Legacy SF parks.
 

Attachments

  • Camp Timber Trail - Aerial View 01.jpg
    Camp Timber Trail - Aerial View 01.jpg
    32.1 MB · Views: 51
  • Camp Timber Trail - Aerial View 02.jpg
    Camp Timber Trail - Aerial View 02.jpg
    32.2 MB · Views: 51
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad