I wouldn’t put it past them to throw us off like that. They’ve purposely kept manufacturer information blocked out so that thoosies wouldn’t be able to see it on any shipping documents. Could totally see them doing something like this.On that same note (sorry for the double post), but if this is truly a Boardwalk coaster, I’m not sure what they could name it that fits purple track, dark grey supports, and a 400+ foot height.
GADV knows we're nosy. They know enthusiasts are on top of every trademark filing the second it happens. On one hand, Phantom Spire could be a red herring just to get us buzzing. They’ve done this in the past with 300ft+ coasters; trademarking Centurion as a fakeout for Fury 325 and Polaris for Orion. Honestly, those two names were so simple they probably came up with them on the toilet.
By comparison, Phantom Spire feels like more than sitting-on-the-toilet thought was put into it. It’s a high-concept name that to me suggests a gothic, abandoned cathedral or graveyard vibe, especially if they play into the Ka tower being the literal "phantom spire" of the area. It feels way more sophisticated than those usual throwaway trademarks. Then again, look at Tormenta (the newest 300ft+ coaster); they trademarked that one name way in advance, and it ended up being the actual name.
Either the name is a total placeholder to distract us (which, if it is, is a very very clever one and someone deserves a raise for that) or there's more to the Phantom Spire "lore" than meets the eye.
I like the name Phantom Spire a lot, but if it’s something else I wouldn’t complain either.