Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I would caution everyone that the statements of a KD social media person should probably be taken with a grain of salt. He may not know about everything that is being planned, developed, and/or implemented right now. Moreover, even if he does, he may not choose to share it with the public yet.
 
Given that KD's marketing stated "no new ride hardware" in Jungle X, does not mean that nothing could happen for 2024. The park could extend the Jungle X detailed thematic elements all the way to Anaconda next year; especially if BLSC recieved a theme makeover.

Given all the surveying going on in Volcano's location this summer, something is happening in the near future. Just not for 2024.

I wonder if 2024 will be used for infrastructure improvements such as the parking lot and parking toll booths. Maybe changes at the front gate with permanent structures built for the new metal detectors and bag check lanes. Seems plausible given the 50th anniversary in 2025
It would make sense to do additional Jungle X improvements for 50th anniversary because the 40th anniversary also had area touch ups in Safari Village and CAG. Except that (not to be geeky) KD had previews in 1974, and officially opened in 1975. That is why the 40th celebration lasted 2014-15. Could we see them start doing anniversary things in 2024?
 
People go to parks like kings dominion for coasters first and foremost.
Not refuting this, but Canada's Wonderland is a great example of how flats can be headliners at a park. Other than Windseeker and Delirium, KD lacks any flat rides that stand out. I'm still holding confidence that whatever replaces Volcano will be a major coaster, but Jungle X-pedition would benefit massively from a major flat to break things up and add variety. Arachnidia isn't really that.
 
I would caution everyone that the statements of a KD social media person should probably be taken with a grain of salt. He may not know about everything that is being planned, developed, and/or implemented right now. Moreover, even if he does, he may not choose to share it with the public yet.
Yeah I personally strongly doubt Kyle is anywhere near the top level discussions and agree. He’s not involved in any planning or park engineering. He tells us stuff when Kings Dominion authorizes him to do so. When he posted that blog post “10 reasons to own a 2024 pass” the day of the pass sale and 0 of those were “new attraction” and he doubled down on that in our conversation is largely all I need to call that a confirmation that there is not new ride hardware being installed for 2024. At the point of the blog post he was authorized to say nothing was coming in 2024 for new rides. He doesn’t have any authority regarding park engineering or capex allocation.

The “Dorney” part honestly, I immediately took with a salt shaker. Cedar Fair just decided 2024 was the year for Dorneys next coaster at some point. Certainly not “oh we can’t build a ride at KD too it would hurt attendance for Dorney.” I would honestly make the argument most people that go to Kings Dominion probably aren’t even aware Dorney Park exists. I mean a lot of people I know don’t even know SFA is a thing.
 
I can't ride most flat rides, ones that primarily spin. The one big exception is a scrambler which I think because it moves in a star pattern I can tolerate, and I enjoy those a lot. However I certainly think adding some new flats along with a coaster is a great idea because lots of people can ride those rides even if I can't and as was noted the area is short on them. Maybe there will even be one I can ride without getting sick. lol. I will be most interested in a coaster, though, so I would be disappointed if was all flats that were added. There's got to be a coaster too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bill s
Plenty of flat rides in the park but not enough in Jungle X-Pedition, an area dominated by coasters. Why stress so much that whatever goes in place of Volcano can only be a coaster while the west side of the Eiffel Tower only has Grizzly and TT? You could literally put one decent flat ride on the Volcano plot and still have room for a major coaster. There’s also no rule that they can only add so many flat rides in the park unless due to space constraints.

Personally I get very annoyed when people forcefully knock down others’ ideas by saying things like “no that’s a horrible idea. It HAS to be this.” It’s just disrespectful to other people’s imaginations.
I am surprised at how many people underestimate the GP's (well deserved) outrage if whatever replaces Volcano isn't an amazing coaster. If it flats (and only flats), it's not goting to go over well at all. Sure, a nique coaster build with a flat or two incorporated into the footprinte would be really cool, but if it's jut flat, no coaster? Nah fam. Death knell.
 
I am surprised at how many people underestimate the GP's (well deserved) outrage if whatever replaces Volcano isn't an amazing coaster. If it flats (and only flats), it's not goting to go over well at all. Sure, a nique coaster build with a flat or two incorporated into the footprinte would be really cool, but if it's jut flat, no coaster? Nah fam. Death knell.

IMO the issue is more about creating a second park icon to replace the mountain structure. Volcano was a decent coaster, and innovative for it's time, but I don't think it would've had nearly the amount of people upset by it's demise if it wasn't located within the iconic mountain.

If the park either created a second icon in a different location with a new high-thrill coaster or built a non-coaster with an experience that could rival a coaster on that plot... or both... then it's plausible most guests wouldn't care that a new coaster wasn't built on the Volcano plot.

Adding to that, newer guests may not actually care all that much anyways as it's been at least 5 years since anyone could ride Volcano so they may have never gotten a ride. Plus, it's pretty expensive and will take far longer to develop a second icon location, put an incredible ride in it plus another attraction in the existing Volcano plot, and set themselves up for marketing success.

All that said, that's my thinking for why it'll likely be a coaster back there if not also including flats. But, I don't work there and certainly am not part of their decision-making process so it's all speculation until we see anything more concrete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wickluvshaunt<3
I am surprised at how many people underestimate the GP's (well deserved) outrage if whatever replaces Volcano isn't an amazing coaster. If it flats (and only flats), it's not goting to go over well at all. Sure, a nique coaster build with a flat or two incorporated into the footprinte would be really cool, but if it's jut flat, no coaster? Nah fam. Death knell.
Coaster with at least one flat was literally what I was going for in the first place.
 
Last edited:
I’m gonna say something kinda bold here:

I think I-305 serves as a nice second icon for the park and they should lean into that. Or build a hyper in Old Virginia to be visible from 95 and make that visually stunning.

Then they can get around to redoing the front entrance to make a non-ride icon if they want.
 
I’m gonna say something kinda bold here:

I think I-305 serves as a nice second icon for the park and they should lean into that. Or build a hyper in Old Virginia to be visible from 95 and make that visually stunning.

Then they can get around to redoing the front entrance to make a non-ride icon if they want.
A mega structure coaster visible from 95 would be a huge win- and they'd have to build (or at least announce) announce it BEFORE putting flat(s) in Volcano's spot though.
 
I’m gonna say something kinda bold here:

I think I-305 serves as a nice second icon for the park and they should lean into that. Or build a hyper in Old Virginia to be visible from 95 and make that visually stunning.

Then they can get around to redoing the front entrance to make a non-ride icon if they want.
Thinking about this though - I feel like while an icon can include an attraction, it should be able to stand alone without one in the context of this park (obviously, CP is a different story).

Take the OG park icon, the Eiffel Tower. Even without the observation deck in use (Haunt, WinterFest, etc.) It's still an icon on it's own.

The mountain had contained several rides over time, with some being guest favorites, but in the end it was the structure itself that people associated to any of them - it is the icon, not the rides it contained.

So...

While I305 is an awesome ride, and it's height makes it stand out in the skyline, I don't think it's considered any more iconic than other attractions such as the drop tower or windseeker. If it were to be demolished (not anytime soon!) people will miss it as a ride but I doubt that too many would demand that only another high thrill coaster go in it's exact location.
 
I may or may not have brought this up before and this is not to shoot anyone’s ideas down but, I highly doubt we are getting any flats in that area reason being there aren’t enough animal temples for that to be a possibility. There is only three left and one we obviously know is anaconda, and if the rumors about blsc retheme is true, then that only leaves one temple for the volcano replacement. Also, (I’m about to make a big assumption) on the side of the excavator tatters building they have what I’m guessing is the “Big Three” main attractions of JX being the snake(anaconda) feline(blsc?) and a bird(volcano spot?). I doubt they would include a flat as one of the main attractions especially when Tumbili is right there. But then again that’s just my assumption on what that could be.
 
I may or may not have brought this up before and this is not to shoot anyone’s ideas down but, I highly doubt we are getting any flats in that area reason being there aren’t enough animal temples for that to be a possibility. There is only three left and one we obviously know is anaconda, and if the rumors about blsc retheme is true, then that only leaves one temple for the volcano replacement. Also, (I’m about to make a big assumption) on the side of the excavator tatters building they have what I’m guessing is the “Big Three” main attractions of JX being the snake(anaconda) feline(blsc?) and a bird(volcano spot?). I doubt they would include a flat as one of the main attractions especially when Tumbili is right there. But then again that’s just my assumption on what that could be.
Know how there’s a labyrinth pattern in the middle of Flat Rock that leads directly to its center? I thought the KDFans article on JX hypothesized that discovering all of the temples could lead to something like the labyrinth. I always thought they could just add another flat as one of the last temples, maybe the bird temple while BLSC or I305 gets cat (if the latter BLSC could just be Safari jeep theme). Then the major Volcano replacement would be about what is represented by the labyrinth, maybe themed as the biggest discovery in Jungle X-Pedition or a force that ties all of the temples together. There’s also those lunar patterns which very few talk about.

Gist is I’m not certain if the volcano replacement HAS to represent a temple.
 
Last edited:
Know how there’s a labyrinth pattern in the middle of Flat Rock that leads directly to its center? I thought the KDFans article on JX hypothesized that discovering all of the temples could lead to something like the labyrinth. I always thought they could just add another flat as one of the last temples, maybe the bird temple while BLSC or I305 gets cat (if the latter BLSC could just be Safari jeep theme). Then the major Volcano replacement would be about what is represented by the labyrinth, maybe themed as the biggest discovery in Jungle X-Pedition or a force that ties all of the temples together. There’s also those lunar patterns which very few talk about.

Gist is I’m not certain if the volcano replacement HAS to represent a temple.
You make a good point. And if that’s the case I definitely can see a flat coming. Like the replacement being the X in question. Also now that you bring up the moon phases I wonder if those are a hint to the order of when what temple is coming next, cause so far it’s been in order with the maze pattern as well. It starts at arachnidia goes past reptilian and Tumbili and the next fase would be the bird temple then the feline then it takes a turn into the circle after the snake that’s leads to the X. That would definitely be something.
Pic for reference Jungle X-Pedition: Kings Dominion's Newest Area - At Yarn's Length IMG_4386.jpeg
 
Considering the mountain used to house multiple flat rides and CF seems interested in buying flat packages recently. I think we really should get a package at some point. The entire plot of land doesn’t need to be dedicated to a coaster. I’ve always envisioned a ride that uses volcano’s station and has a lift hill stretching over FoF’s launch track. The majority of the layout could be parallel to i305 and behind FoF. Now we have room for a huge expansion of a new Jungle-X section.

The empty stretch of asphalt and benches in between Anaconda’s station and FoF’s lockers has no identity right now, other than giving the only good view of the rock waterfall. Replace the asphalt with pavers and use it as an entry point into a new section. The “rock-work” around Reptilian’s exit path can be opened up / expanded to provide a secondary entry point for the area.

The coaster possibilities are endless, but
I don’t want a crazy prototype with unexpectancy even if KD’s been known for that in the past. I want a nice reliable people eater, refined to the point of basically perfection. A B&M Hyper in the style of Orion would be a great investment but a lot of thoosies would get mad.

If we’re sticking with a lift hill over FoF’s launch track (which would tower over the new entry point), the ride would start with a slight left turn out of Volcano’s station. The layout stretches back parallel to i305 with a large wave turn and overbank. It would eventually make its way back and end with one of those tall brake runs B&M gigas are known for. The brake run is slightly parallel to Reptilian’s lift, travels down to the top of the “rockwork” around Reptilian’s exit, and then there’s a left turn back into the station.
 
Just curious, are you referring to the still-standing queue line building (JX Research Center) as Volcano's station?
 
Yeah, the direction is the same as volcano’s station though.

Does this building include the gift shop under it or was that torn down? Was the gift shop under the queue or a little bit over?
 
Yep, the gift shop was on the bottom level of the building. It’s still there, and so is the wooden boardwalk that connects it to the main path.
 
We don’t even know the layout. Just some concept art of the station. There’s a lot more room than it looks in that area.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad