Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Welp, seeing that Element #2 piece in full view all but confirms that the launch track (probably) does not have a dip at the end. Somehow never noticed/didn't account for the decent elevation change from the start to end of the launch, so that alone explains the gradually increasing width in the launch supports vs. the tripod at the end of the launch.

Also looking at the #8 element & comparing it to my initial version, I don't think the apex of the element will be quite as banked as the image/videos I've made. Think more of a sideways wall-stall than a cutback.. at least that's how it appears in pieces on the ground (which is admittedly hard to analyze).

Man I need to just relax & enjoy the build🤣

(Edited to include a photo of Elem #2:
View attachment 33108
(Train will travel (red direction) across this piece of track. You can see the end of the launch track in the background where these two pieces connect, and you can see that Elem #2 starts curving upwards, right as the track passes over the tripod support)
My prediction is it’ll be something similar to Pipeline’s turnaround after the launch. Something like this but a bit taller:
IMG_8789.jpeg
A wave turn/wall stall on a wing would be cool though. Maybe something like this but between two 90 degree turns:

IMG_8788.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I stopped by this afternoon on the way to SFA to activate my pass (thank god this is probably the last season I have to do that). I like how up close you can get to some of the track pieces.

Security even decided to mess with me as I was taking photos and video “hey we gotta kill you for looking at that information” I was like “for taking a photo of the track sitting here?” They cracked up and carried on since I was just standing outside the fence.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4671.jpeg
    IMG_4671.jpeg
    9 MB · Views: 44
  • IMG_4656.jpeg
    IMG_4656.jpeg
    6.2 MB · Views: 36
  • IMG_4655.jpeg
    IMG_4655.jpeg
    6.7 MB · Views: 34
  • IMG_4647.jpeg
    IMG_4647.jpeg
    4.2 MB · Views: 30
  • IMG_4648.jpeg
    IMG_4648.jpeg
    3.9 MB · Views: 37
  • IMG_4660.jpeg
    IMG_4660.jpeg
    6.8 MB · Views: 37
  • IMG_4663.mov
    28.4 MB
  • IMG_4664.jpeg
    IMG_4664.jpeg
    5.5 MB · Views: 45
  • IMG_4684.jpeg
    IMG_4684.jpeg
    8.7 MB · Views: 46
My prediction is it’ll be something similar to Pipeline’s turnaround after the launch. Something like this but a bit taller:
I agree mostly, "wall stall" may not have been the best choice of term. Based on the track pieces, I'm not expecting it to have the same top-down curvature that the overbank you cited has, rather, something like the image below. I'm just envisioning something that has a clear rise, 'stall out' (like, possibly... a stalling airplane...?) and dive back down, all with very little change in roll:

1719108400017.png 1719108412482.png
 
I agree mostly, "wall stall" may not have been the best choice of term. Based on the track pieces, I'm not expecting it to have the same top-down curvature that the overbank you cited has, rather, something like the image below. I'm just envisioning something that has a clear rise, 'stall out' (like, possibly... a stalling airplane...?) and dive back down, all with very little change in roll:

View attachment 33133View attachment 33134
Hoping you are correct, think this would be a super fun element
 
  • Like
Reactions: MysticClay
Jack Nicholson Yes GIF


Yes…. Keep building
 
Some more construction photos from today. This wad after the quit for the day.
 

Attachments

  • VideoCapture_20240625-203152.jpg
    VideoCapture_20240625-203152.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 80
  • VideoCapture_20240625-181126.jpg
    VideoCapture_20240625-181126.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 75
  • VideoCapture_20240625-203024.jpg
    VideoCapture_20240625-203024.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 70
  • VideoCapture_20240625-181115.jpg
    VideoCapture_20240625-181115.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 63
  • VideoCapture_20240625-181201.jpg
    VideoCapture_20240625-181201.jpg
    965.2 KB · Views: 57
  • VideoCapture_20240625-182405.jpg
    VideoCapture_20240625-182405.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 57
  • 20240625_182619.jpg
    20240625_182619.jpg
    3.5 MB · Views: 55
  • 20240625_182620.jpg
    20240625_182620.jpg
    4.1 MB · Views: 56
  • VideoCapture_20240625-202850.jpg
    VideoCapture_20240625-202850.jpg
    1,006.7 KB · Views: 58
  • VideoCapture_20240625-202842.jpg
    VideoCapture_20240625-202842.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 58
  • 20240625_182749.mp4
    32.7 MB
Wonder why the launch track supports are I-BEAM instead of cylinder style like Thunderbird at Holiday World? Engineering/Design evolution? Plus, this coaster launch is inclined; while the Thunderbird launch appears fairly level.
Pipeline has some I-beam supports on its launch as well. Hulk also has some I-beams in the water in the valleys of the cobra roll. I think it’s just the direction B&M decided to go in and deemed it to be structurally superior
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad