michaelcollier1 said:They wont get a 300 ft + coaster, Kings Mill will fight that one to the death
Chris said:michaelcollier1 said:They wont get a 300 ft + coaster, Kings Mill will fight that one to the death
Kingsmill doesn't hold the same amount of pull it used to. There are always at least two residents at any planning commission meeting that object to ANYTHING the park does. They make no difference. The board votes against the residents of Kingsmill all the time, the main reason being the residents (the vocal ones) just don't want any progress at all.
Swiftman said:Carl Lum was one of the people in the room talking about the ride. If they lied, that's just shameful.
Swiftman said:I have no reason not to trust my source. The only way my source could better prove that what they're saying is true is if they met me somewhere, told me in person, and showed me pictures they snapped at the meeting. Everything my source has told me matches up perfectly with what is coming from other people. If it isn't 300ft, it's not because of the sources, it's the park.
Swiftman said:When were height waivers filed for past coasters?
Fur Dozy said:How is it bad business? They can tell who they want, what they want, when they want. As long as they haven't broken ground on anything out of current waivers, they're good.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.