Because of course!A rumor circulating amongst general reliable sources is she was let go as part of corporate restructuring. I have not been able to solidly confirm it but believe it most likely is true.
Because of course!A rumor circulating amongst general reliable sources is she was let go as part of corporate restructuring. I have not been able to solidly confirm it but believe it most likely is true.
I’ve heard this from a large handful of sources too, so I feel comfortable corroborating this. This is no doubt part of the wave of exits of talented leaders that former CF CEO Matt Ouimet was lamenting on Linkedin yesterday.A rumor circulating amongst general reliable sources is she was let go as part of corporate restructuring. I have not been able to solidly confirm it but believe it most likely is true.
This is the part that gets me, being that I’ve felt the same about the merger and have agreed with a lot of what you’ve said regarding it. I do still think it’ll be for the better for some parks (primarily SFOG, SFOT, and Great Adventure) but it’s definitely going to hurt others. We’ve already seen that with SFA, although I do honestly believe it only accelerated its closure and that it was inevitable in the somewhat near future.I’ve tried to be optimistic about this merger, so I hope people don’t take this statement as being overdramatic.
What do you mean good for great adventure?! They took out the worlds tallest coaster for crying out loud!This is the part that gets me, being that I’ve felt the same about the merger and have agreed with a lot of what you’ve said regarding it. I do still think it’ll be for the better for some parks (primarily SFOG, SFOT, and Great Adventure) but it’s definitely going to hurt others. We’ve already seen that with SFA, although I do honestly believe it only accelerated its closure and that it was inevitable in the somewhat near future.
Sadly, from what I’m hearing, the circumstances that led to Bridgette’s departure will be (negatively) impacting most of the SF parks, if not all of them.This is the part that gets me, being that I’ve felt the same about the merger and have agreed with a lot of what you’ve said regarding it. I do still think it’ll be for the better for some parks (primarily SFOG, SFOT, and Great Adventure) but it’s definitely going to hurt others. We’ve already seen that with SFA, although I do honestly believe it only accelerated its closure and that it was inevitable in the somewhat near future.
The world’s tallest coaster that soon wouldn’t have been the tallest anyway, cost the park a ton annually in maintenance fees, and really just wasn’t very popular for several years until the rumors of its removal began, likely due to its remote location within the park.What do you mean good for great adventure?! They took out the worlds tallest coaster for crying out loud!
welcome to the era where dominator becomes batman knight flight and alot of in park adsThis is definitely a bad sign of things to come. Losing talent kills companies.
Dear god, just send it off to Herschend!While it won’t bring Bridgette back, stupid-as-fuck decisions like this one, plus WinterFest’s cancellation, make me wonder if we’d be better off being sold to another chain.
God, how can I not panic when my favorite theme park is being completely fucked over by corporate? What do we do? Do we just sit here and let this corporation ruin our favorite parks just for the stupid share holders?
View attachment 37922
I think it’s important to remember that most theme parks we love have always ultimately been in service of shareholders. The only reason we love them is because people invested in making and running them to make money. I don’t mean to sound like a “bootlicker,” but I think it’s important not to lose sight of the real dynamics here.
What’s really happening is simply a paradigm shift in how shareholders are being served. The parks we love will still exist, and by and large they’ll still continue to put forward things for us to love. In many ways, a data-driven company with a strong planning and design wing may actually give us more of what we want, in some ways. In theory, our incentives are aligned: the more they give us things we’re willing to pay for, the more money they make. Many day-to-day guests might never even know a change happened.
But the fact remains that for 27 (soon to be 25) parks throughout the country, the old-school way of managing parks — with boots on the ground, and general managers and their team tinkering with the dials to deliver the best experience to their guests — is done. And maybe I’m an old-school theme park fan, but I think I’ll really miss the small touches and personal feeling that that management style brought to the parks.
It’s always baffled me that in professional sports, fans are willing to publicly pressure ownership to sell a franchise if they aren’t actively working to make it better. In the theme park community I’ve always felt like we have a tendency to defend ownership.While it won’t bring Bridgette back, stupid-as-fuck decisions like this one, plus WinterFest’s cancellation, make me wonder if KD would be better off being sold to another chain.
JUST GIVE IT TO HERSCHEND! I want to eat cinnamon bread while I marathon grizzly!It’s always baffled me that in professional sports, fans are willing to publicly pressure ownership to sell a franchise if they aren’t actively working to make it better. In the theme park community I’ve always felt like we have a tendency to defend ownership.
There was a lot more capital investment in KD during the early days of cedar fair, and under previous owners, than there is now. That’s a fact. Now with the merger, there’s a lot of experimentation with cost cutting with KD - selling off excess land, laying off most of the full time staff, managing the park remotely, cancelling a large seasonal event, removing a handful of older rides.
They should sell this park to another company with a smaller portfolio who has interest in investing more in this region.
Personal relationships with employees improves morale and having boots on the ground allows you to put your finger directly on the heartbeat of the park to know what makes it work and what doesn’t. You can’t really quantify that though. I hope these regional managers still spend plenty of time at the parks they preside over.Not to defend corporate’s decision, however I am genuinely curious how much control GMs actually have over the parks vs corporate decision making. What tasks are part of their day to day beyond being just a name and a face representing the park. In the retail world they would monitor and submit data to corporate, scheduling and customer service, hiring/firing, exc. Given they have departments and department heads that handle those tasks for their respective departments (hr, operations/aqutics, park services, entertainment, food and beverage, guest services, exc). I kinda fail to see where in this industry with 25 parks vs 2500 retail locations, that position is critical to park operations. I can see how that job can be handled at the corporate level. Once again, not defending, just sort of playing devils advocate a little bit.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.