Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
They just need to replace all of the speakers in the ride. UPDATE:as of today the music in the last room has been fixed
 
Last edited:
I can actually sense the boat moving and fire blasting while listening to that.

Anyone else think it'd be awesome to take any and all of the ride music scores and have them played in concert at the park?
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Quist
I can actually sense the boat moving and fire blasting while listening to that.

I’m pretty sure that music doesn’t actually play on the ride, just as atmospheric music around the Pompeii pathway. I believe the music on the ride is a custom score that isn’t availabke online due to copyright.
 
I’m pretty sure that music doesn’t actually play on the ride, just as atmospheric music around the Pompeii pathway. I believe the music on the ride is a custom score that isn’t availabke online due to copyright.
Could always try and contact corporate to see if they would add it to the company Spotify. Apollo and EITA are on there and so are the Illuminights and Star Spangled Nights soundtracks.
 
  • Love
Reactions: belsaas
My understanding is that the music was composed by a third party and the park has extremely limited rights to use it, unlike the Apollo lift music and such. For example, the Pompeii music isn’t available anywhere on SWP&E’s iTunes account, and even the park’s official on-ride POV of Pompeii posted on YouTube has the original music edited out and overlaid with a generic song.
 
For obvious reasons I'm guessing there was never a thought about that when building the ride.

However, if it ever gets a complete overhaul they could switch out music (sacredlidge to some, progress for others)?
 
For obvious reasons I'm guessing there was never a thought about that when building the ride.

However, if it ever gets a complete overhaul they could switch out music (sacredlidge to some, progress for others)?
Contrary to your statement, I'm sure it was a thought. I'm sure they bought the rights to exclusively use on-ride only from the composer. The licensing agreement probably prohibits any other usage by either the park or the composer. I doubt the park was going to release an EFP "Greatest Hits" so they pay, knowing the music will not be heard any place but their attraction.
 
Contrary to your statement, I'm sure it was a thought. I'm sure they bought the rights to exclusively use on-ride only from the composer. The licensing agreement probably prohibits any other usage by either the park or the composer. I doubt the park was going to release an EFP "Greatest Hits" so they pay, knowing the music will not be heard any place but their attraction.


I don't disagree there, but what I meant was licensing coverage for use on digital platforms that didn't exist at the time such as on-ride video posted to a website.

My guess is the park never considered that sort of situation at the time; the most likely think they had to consider would have been any newsreel footage.

However, they could always deny access to the parts of the ride playing the music to any news crew so it would a non-issue.

They could potentially go back to whomever they obtained a licensure from to get more functionality than their current on-ride only situation, but my guess is that'd be way too expensive and time consuming for little to no gain.
 
You rarely see a park post a POV, especially a dark ride. They want people in the park to ride it, not watch on YouTube and ruin the surprise/suspense. So why buy a license for areas they don't really care or want to reach? Or, the opposite, the composer doesn't want it used outside the on-ride.
 
You rarely see a park post a POV, especially a dark ride. They want people in the park to ride it, not watch on YouTube and ruin the surprise/suspense. So why buy a license for areas they don't really care or want to reach? Or, the opposite, the composer doesn't want it used outside the on-ride.
I think the point was that the park really wasn't thinking that the music would be heard outside the ride at all (keep in mind that the founder of GoPro was still a teenager when this ride opened), so agreeing to use a soundtrack that could only be heard while on the ride was fine with them and that revisiting that contract because you can now take a video on-ride and post it on Youtube seems like a waste of time and money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonesta6
Again, can't disagree - but what happens if a guest does it?

Could a guest recording violate the license terms, and would either the park or the licensing organization (composer or whomever owns the rights) go after said guest?
 
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad