I wish every park had a sky ride and a train.
BUT THE TREE REMOVAL WOULD BE WORTH ITThat would require A LOT of tree removal.
At this point parks that don’t have any transportation rides won’t see new ones installed unless they are used to connect parks in a property.
That would be neat, I guess, but I feel like Unless they finally make use of all of the land they own to the east of the rail road tracks and make an entire new land out there, the only way a skyride at 2020's KD would make sense is to have it go from near the entrance to the water park. Any other route doesn't make that much sense. Anyone know if they can put a curve in them? I'm thinking lift up, turn, ride/decend. You could put one stop in the dominator area, where there is so much unused space, have it hook around either side of Woodstock Express, and then down to the water park area (line placement approximate, there is plenty of wiggle room - around the north side of Woodstock would probably be better, and involve fewer trees removed, but the tool in paint didn't want to cooperate.)A better layout I think for a new skyride to fit KD in its current state would be a double line linking Jungle X to Old VA. Starting at Mt. Kilimanjaro, crossing perpendicular to I-Street past Delerium, over the Antique cars with the other station next to the creek and Grizzly Gulch. It requires very little tree removal besides a spot or two for towers in the cars area and is a great way to see essentially the entire park.
View attachment 34327
Mount Kilimanjaro itself and Grizzly Falls Arcade building could actually perhaps be repurposed/renovated into skyride stations for this route as well. They line up quite nicely. Mount Kiimanjaro still has electrical service for the Bayern Curve that was housed in there years ago.
Fair enough. And I’m not picturing paving paradise so to speak, just more something in between and less condensing to areas.Infilling more rides means less trees. KD has been growing into one of the more naturally beautiful amusement parks out there. I'd rather the park remain sprawling and wooded than more densely packed with attractions. The park has an absurd amount of land—I'd prefer they use it.
If you put the terminus at the front of the water park, that's also the back of the dry park. So this criticism is not really valid - whether or not the park would benefit at all from a transpo ride is fair game for debate though. 100% agree with you on making more use of the empty land they own though. There is actually more unused land than used land that they own - there's no need for infill or ride removals to expand.Also, a transport ride to the water park is not a good idea at all in my opinion. It massively limits the usefulness and operating calendar of the attraction.
honestly, an elevated sight-seeing loop around the park would be a fun leisurely activity on a tiring hot dayI don't think you *need* a transportation ride to actually get anywhere. It's just a great, relaxing thing to do when you want to take a break from the thrill rides, and a good way to see the park, especially if it runs you through areas and/or vantage points you can't otherwise get. Though if it also gets you from point A to point B, that's an excellent bonus.
I can only speak for myself when I say if KD added a train and/or sky ride, I would definitely visit the park in part to ride them.
Even better, what about a observation tower with elevators to the top? maybe even model it off the Eiffel tower, similar to what Kings Island has maybe. Just a thought.honestly, an elevated sight-seeing loop around the park would be a fun leisurely activity on a tiring hot day
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.