I.think were going under ground .tunnels . Also the landscaping will be very different and the skyline will be much differently
But copperhead strike is much smaller and less terrain oriented, plus they are being built for two different reasons ; copperhead strike being made as a coaster to support the lineup and fill in gaps of the launch areas of the parks lineup, while this attraction being made as a possible headliner and made to complete and make the lineup better than ever before, but alas theming wise could be on the same level but I hope more on ride theming not in the breakrun (definitely not pointing to mystic timbers)Has anyone considered a Mack multi launch? this whole thing just seems very reminiscent of copperhead. Don’t ask me how it just does.Also just wanna add on they could’ve very well have purchased this ride at the same time as SFGA’s new extreme spinner.
No FAA filings, land development permits, building permits, or applications with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation exist yet.How has nothing about this coaster come out yet? Like no FAA filings, no permits, no nothing. It's really quite impressive!
New area?
New amusement ride.New area?
A ride called werewolf gorge? That sounds more like an area name for me.New amusement ride.
Well, I hope it's not for the big ride. Maybe a flat ride or something.Class 028 indicates this will be a ride and not an area.
to be fair, that name alone would attract featheries to the rideWerewolfHawk.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.