I get the disappointment of this ride not being in the same height category as Kingda Ka, but to be honest on this style of ride it matters a lot less. If 400 ft. is the standard of really f***ing tall, then a ride that is only 93.75% of really f***ing tall is still going to feel just as really f***ing tall to anyone who rides it. Nobody is going to be whipping out a measuring device while twirling around at the top of the tower, read a height lower than they expected, and suddenly decide a pretty kick-ass ride is mid just because it's a little shorter than they wanted it to be. This is still the second tallest coaster on the continent and the tallest that has been built domestically in over two decades.
Could the coaster have reached that 400 ft point? Absolutely. Were there likely logistical reasons why they chose to go with the height they did rather than push the limit even further? Absolutely. Is it valid to feel a bit bitter that this coaster isn't quite as big as expected, especially when the 400 ft number was (if I recall correctly) explicitly mentioned in surveys regarding the ride? Absolutely. Should this have an appreciable impact on the ride experience of the final attraction, assuming all other design aspects are as we currently expect them to be? Absolutely not.
And for those saying "they should have got a normal giga," I'd be willing to bet this is still only half to two thirds the price of an Orion-sized giga in 2026 dollars, which half of the enthusiasts don't even consider a giga. Personally, I'd much, much, much rather have this thing at SFGAdv than a ride like that.
Could the coaster have reached that 400 ft point? Absolutely. Were there likely logistical reasons why they chose to go with the height they did rather than push the limit even further? Absolutely. Is it valid to feel a bit bitter that this coaster isn't quite as big as expected, especially when the 400 ft number was (if I recall correctly) explicitly mentioned in surveys regarding the ride? Absolutely. Should this have an appreciable impact on the ride experience of the final attraction, assuming all other design aspects are as we currently expect them to be? Absolutely not.
And for those saying "they should have got a normal giga," I'd be willing to bet this is still only half to two thirds the price of an Orion-sized giga in 2026 dollars, which half of the enthusiasts don't even consider a giga. Personally, I'd much, much, much rather have this thing at SFGAdv than a ride like that.
Last edited: