I’m not sure how truthful this was, but on a coaster insider tour at BGT in 2011 our guide without anyone mentioning it brought up the contract and said it was a real document explaining the lack of dive coasters in the US at the time.
I 100% agree with you on them giving incorrect information/the signs were wrong. That was absolutely unacceptable. They should have made sure they were 100% accurate and that people knew what they were talking about.I totally agree with the last two posts. I've working in advertising/marketing for mucho years (no age questions @belsaas ?) and this seemingly thrown together effort doesn't reflect well in their $20+ million investment. Laptop to an internet connection? For a multi million dollar project? With zero backup?
There should have been a POV. Hell, they could have called Intimidator 305, have him sign an NDA and had an almost perfect presentation in no time. Do it like Intamin did with their Parc Asterix presentation, with key stats on the screen (just make sure they match the signs and handouts).
There's so much more...
@BGWnut Sorry... That's total BS and almost sounds like the marketing department dictated it. I've worked in advertising/marketing since AM radio. It's one thing to say "keep them coming back for more" but, more importantly, it's to make sure EVERY message is 100% accurate. They didn't do that today. Three launches? Four launches? 178 ft tall? 180ft? Now they're in the position of "let me clarify" which is not the tact to be taking for a multi million dollar project they're banking on to increase traffic for years to come. Yes, there's something that could have been done - They could have been better prepared.
/End Old man rant
Any word on when construction walls may go up?
I believe they released a POV for Griffon at announcement. I 100% remember a POV, but I can't quite recall if it was released concurrently with the announcement.Also in the pov front I'm trying to remember if BGW has ever released a pov with a coaster announcement. I don't think they ever had. If that's the case then there is certainly precedent that they won't have one until the ride is open.
Conspiracy time-I agree Jason. They presented it as if they don’t even realize how good the ride will be, or why. Maybe they did it intentionally to keep hype up by releasing bits and pieces as they go, but it does seem like a missed opportunity.
Conspiracy time-
Maybe it's a last minute consolation project after Madrid was restructured into two separate projects, and they needed something on short notice before the "main" project of the contract. ?
-End conspiracy time
Do I actually believe that? To some extent, yes, it likely is a rushed project/design to replace a cancelled project.
A few pages back I referenced the infamous "leaked slide" of September, 2018. On it you'll see a few factoids that are close to Pantheon. Also shown is an (almost) duplication of Pantheon tracks above the treeline. So, it's apparent Pantheon was in the pipeline then. If it takes SEAS/BGW (a minimum of) 11 months to create a campaign, they need a new marketing department.Conspiracy time-
Maybe it's a last minute consolation project after Madrid was restructured into two separate projects, and they needed something on short notice before the "main" project of the contract. ?
-End conspiracy time
Do I actually believe that? To some extent, yes, it likely is a rushed project/design to replace a cancelled project.
Even Larry didn’t seem to hyped about it. Shortest presentation with the littlest amount of excitement I’ve seen for a coaster announcement at Busch. Strange.I agree Jason. They presented it as if they don’t even realize how good the ride will be, or why. Maybe they did it intentionally to keep hype up by releasing bits and pieces as they go, but it does seem like a missed opportunity.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.