Looking at the comment "That project will be about 180 feet at its tallest" could also be interpreted (being subversive, here) as the structure...and not taking into account the land it's sitting on. No issue if it was, they already have approval to go higher.
Which brings an interesting (to me, anyway) if the "Madrid" project was cancelled and the plans we've seen are the "second" project (MMXX), why did they carry those 300+ft heights (if you recall, twice in the submission) forward when they knew all along it wasn't going to be even close to that?
That'll be in Spain "Huevos Rancheros"I'm incredibly disappointed we're getting a crappy launch coaster and not a 180 foot Eggery Deggery clone that has fire effects.?
Seems like they had a 'Madrid' plan in the works- possibly an entire new small park section, anchored by some 300+' attraction.
That fell through so they decided to just put the coaster portion there and the rest of the original plan evolved into the 2021 project across the water, in the other field... also now proposing a 300+' attraction. In either case, I don't think that attraction ever was or is going to be a gigacoaster.
Based on what we have heard the original plan was for a red force clone where you have a launch and then a top hat and then return basically just come back to the station.
I am that's why I just based on what we've heard. While plausible is definitely not anywhere near confirmed.I would remain incredibly skeptical of that claim. Just sayin'
what if madridbot was right?I would remain incredibly skeptical of that claim. Just sayin'
what if madridbot was right?
I think he was cancelled, along with the project.But he has "Madrid" right in his name.
While a top hat was involved, he wasn 't talking about a red force clone.what if madridbot was wrong?
I have reason to believe a Red Force clone was not the plan. That's all I can say publicly right now.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.