Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't speak on it. I simply acted as a second pair of eyes on the source document to confirm WildGravityTravels wasn't pulling this stuff out of thin air.
 
I don’t get how a shuttle works here. Would it be something like Soarin With Dragons? Is it a backwards section?

Is it this going to be a launch lift hill into the drop? It seems like it’s going to be a first of its kind.
 
Unless they're not using the full 315 foot waiver (or the 315 foot waiver is for a StarFlyer tucked in there), I'm now very worried about only 76 MPH. At least it'll be a more powerful drop into the water than the half-hearted jerk Verbolten offers. BGW sure wants to challenge KD for the title of launch coaster capital, do they?

At this point, I'm more excited for San Antonio's addition in that list. First wooden coaster in the area since Rattler got RMC'd. For some reason I thought ZDT's was Houston area. Apparently it's San Antonio area.
 
Last edited:
I swear I've read this article backwards and forwards about 5 times and it makes no sense. 300 foot tall multi-launch shuttle coaster?

Because just breaking down some of the math things here:
~A drop height of 185-190 can get you to 76 MPH. So why file for up to 300+ Feet if you wouldn't need all that height? Unless as someone suggested they do a combined attraction here, or the 300 ft part includes a drop tower like Kinda Ka now does.
~Most coasters that top 300 feet reach mid-90's in speed.
~Where I'm really confused is shuttle coasters don't make full loops, so how is the final drop into the Rhine and 76 MPH....theoretically shouldn't that be the 1st drop too?
~Final drop is where the high speed is? So that makes a 2nd ride and the 3rd time BGW is going to do this? (BBW, Bolt)
~Sounds like a real low capacity monster. For a park with a few low capacity rides already, that sounds like a terrible idea.

I think the wording of final drop while describing it as a shuttle coaster; and the peak speed with the height; are the things that don't matchup to me.

I dunno, @Zachary I know you can't share what you saw, but maybe if you can clarify some of those things.
 
Fair enough. Thanks. Hopefully they don't take long to come out with it when there's some (IMO) big questions in the bits of info they dropped.
 
As I read on /r/rollercoaster Intamin's "Soaring With Dragon" closely resembles some aspects in the newest leak. It's not as tall as the 300ft and triple launched vs the dual launched but speed is close to the leaked info. Perhaps, they've moved on from their original plans and aren't going as tall. And the rumor of Intamin being the builder returns.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bill s
Imo he got the launch coaster portion right but misread some of the information or was told wrong.

76 mph is actually like insanely slow for 315 feet. In a launch it’s even slow for 215 feet.
 
Imo he got the launch coaster portion right but misread some of the information or was told wrong.

76 mph is actually like insanely slow for 315 feet. In a launch it’s even slow for 215 feet.
The (above) coaster is about 200ft and hits just over 77mph at launch.
 
It’s 180 something. And how do you build a coaster over 100 feet less than the height permit? Busch has never done that.

You technically can do that if you choose. Just because you file for a waiver doesn't mean you have to use it.

But additionally, I'll do some digging (REALLY slow day at work, people don't like golfing in a hurricane) but on the cover sheet this it's still listed as:
SUBJECT:

CBPA 18-0148 : Busch Gardens, Madrid

Which reflects the same as the height waiver. I'll make sure that's the case, but as far as I'm aware in my digging this is still tied.

That said, I'm willing to give it up to a week or so for WildGravityTravels to expand on what they said. This definitely needs some clarification IMO.
 
Well if they really opt to build a giga shuttle coaster I am disappointed as well and may drop our Busch Gardens visit in 2020 in favor for another park......
My 2020 plans are all riding on what Project Madrid turns out to be, and what Hersheypark, Cedar Point, and Kings Island are building for 2020. If Project Madrid turns out to be a "Full Throttle" - gimmick launch coaster with a short experience and low capacity, it'll take free beer for me to get a BGW membership for 2020 - otherwise my big trip will be Pennsylvania and Ohio, not Florida.

I hope the "shuttle" part of it means a "Soaring with Dragon" launch, and then the rest of the ride is more like Maverick in using the terrain and giving a full experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGW Family
Here's the interview where 300 foot Trex comes from. Him saying it has the capacity to do 300+ feet is what would concern me as a park. Doing not only the first T-Rex but also going over 300 Ft at the same time. That's not exactly something you should want to do. Let them get 1 T-Rex out before you push the limits of what it can do.

FWIW TRex talk starts at the 5:00 mark.

He's being conservative saying "300-ft plus" in this video.

He's aiming for tall. I mean really tall!
 
My 2020 plans are all riding on what Project Madrid turns out to be, and what Hersheypark, Cedar Point, and Kings Island are building for 2020. If Project Madrid turns out to be a "Full Throttle" - gimmick launch coaster with a short experience and low capacity, it'll take free beer for me to get a BGW membership for 2020 - otherwise my big trip will be Pennsylvania and Ohio, not Florida.

I hope the "shuttle" part of it means a "Soaring with Dragon" launch, and then the rest of the ride is more like Maverick in using the terrain and giving a full experience.

This and actually going 315 ft up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SLC Headache
Status
Not open for further replies.
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad