RE: Project Madrid: New Hamlet? Giga Coaster? 315' Tower?
So, with my experience as a township planner, and having to build some unique structures over areas where you can't put footers in a certain area. Most times we're talking bridges, but hey, putting a roller coaster over something like this is like building a bridge right?
So without knowing the full forces, here's a quick rendering of what it could look like:
https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1MegJSbDJ65zJw4zybaixFHFNjQD1TOtMysPbx9Xz9lg/edit?usp=sharing
Red being the pipeline, blue the easement, black the track, bright blue being the supports. Theoretically if they tie the supports on the two sides together, they could have those forces disbursed over a greater area, thus making it smoother and more stable. Then in the middle, tying it to the track will dampen vibrations.
It is a shame they won't work with Intamin, because just seeing how they handled projects in Hersheypark and some of the support/environmental restrictions there, they could build a really awesome coaster for BGW in that area with minimal impact. If you look at Skyrush, they have two 110+ foot spans with no supports because of the double backbone structure to the track.
Another thought, given Sea World's growing relationship with Mack Rides, and them having a hyper, and it sounding like they might use the dip to river level, Mack might be willing to take a shot because the lift hill doesn't have to hit 300 ft for a 300 ft drop.
halfabee said:Arrow once had some promotional material that made a big deal about the Loch Ness truss structure they engineered to cross the pipeline right of way. Of course that all had to be designed by hand... no fancy computers in Arrow's offices back then.
I can think of a manufacturer who likes to build lifts with very few support points spaced very far apart, enabled by massive truss structures and double-spine track spans... but I don't think we are likely to see them installing a ride at BGW anytime soon.
So, with my experience as a township planner, and having to build some unique structures over areas where you can't put footers in a certain area. Most times we're talking bridges, but hey, putting a roller coaster over something like this is like building a bridge right?
So without knowing the full forces, here's a quick rendering of what it could look like:
https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1MegJSbDJ65zJw4zybaixFHFNjQD1TOtMysPbx9Xz9lg/edit?usp=sharing
Red being the pipeline, blue the easement, black the track, bright blue being the supports. Theoretically if they tie the supports on the two sides together, they could have those forces disbursed over a greater area, thus making it smoother and more stable. Then in the middle, tying it to the track will dampen vibrations.
It is a shame they won't work with Intamin, because just seeing how they handled projects in Hersheypark and some of the support/environmental restrictions there, they could build a really awesome coaster for BGW in that area with minimal impact. If you look at Skyrush, they have two 110+ foot spans with no supports because of the double backbone structure to the track.
Another thought, given Sea World's growing relationship with Mack Rides, and them having a hyper, and it sounding like they might use the dip to river level, Mack might be willing to take a shot because the lift hill doesn't have to hit 300 ft for a 300 ft drop.