Both sides are right here in my assessment.
Year-round-ish ops have degraded the park experience year-round, damaged the park's reputation, acted as a huge drain on already limited resources, etc. Yes, all of these issues COULD be fixed with increased funding, but we know they won't be. The park SHOULD pick a lane—either close for the off-season or properly fund year-round operations—but they're not going to as long as people keep showing up over the winter months and as long as they lose less money operating than they would if they were closed.
I'll also say this: Part of this is also a marketing issue. Marketing's unwillingness to accurately/effectively communicate to prospective guests when and to what degree the park is operating in a limited/degraded state causes a lot of the pain here. People show up to the park during what was previously core operating season in March and April and now find a significantly degraded experience vs a few years ago. If BGW accurately communicated to guests that the experience was going to be notably worse rather than effectively tricking people to show up regardless, year-round ops at current funding levels may suddenly not look so compelling on a spreadsheet. Instead the park is opting to cash in on their reputation and legacy in the short-term—a move I obviously think is awful.
Year-round-ish ops have degraded the park experience year-round, damaged the park's reputation, acted as a huge drain on already limited resources, etc. Yes, all of these issues COULD be fixed with increased funding, but we know they won't be. The park SHOULD pick a lane—either close for the off-season or properly fund year-round operations—but they're not going to as long as people keep showing up over the winter months and as long as they lose less money operating than they would if they were closed.
I'll also say this: Part of this is also a marketing issue. Marketing's unwillingness to accurately/effectively communicate to prospective guests when and to what degree the park is operating in a limited/degraded state causes a lot of the pain here. People show up to the park during what was previously core operating season in March and April and now find a significantly degraded experience vs a few years ago. If BGW accurately communicated to guests that the experience was going to be notably worse rather than effectively tricking people to show up regardless, year-round ops at current funding levels may suddenly not look so compelling on a spreadsheet. Instead the park is opting to cash in on their reputation and legacy in the short-term—a move I obviously think is awful.
Last edited: