• Throughout the day, the forums may become intermittenly unavailable. We are working on restoring service as soon as possible. If you have any questions or issues, feel free to message the admins or email Gavin.
Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
I'm sitting here looking at the I-95 EZPass project they're doing and thinking, "Wow, this whole center median of 95 would be perfect for a train."
It would be. We waste so much land and space for projects here. There’s a lot of places that have outlawed elevated trains over roadways or between roads because of derailments, which aren’t all that common.

As for Kalahari itself, I think it’s going to be a good thing. I really makes a nice “park trail” from HP to SFA to Kalahari for a few nights to also get KD, then BGW. To me that’s something that the park “trail” past DC has missed, was the nice place to have an off day without a day full of travel.

Additionally given how busy KD and WCUSA get, another water park isn’t the worst thing in the world, especially if Kalahari builds up KD/BGW partnerships and provides shuttles to them.
 
It would be. We waste so much land and space for projects here. There’s a lot of places that have outlawed elevated trains over roadways or between roads because of derailments, which aren’t all that common.

As for Kalahari itself, I think it’s going to be a good thing. I really makes a nice “park trail” from HP to SFA to Kalahari for a few nights to also get KD, then BGW. To me that’s something that the park “trail” past DC has missed, was the nice place to have an off day without a day full of travel.

Additionally given how busy KD and WCUSA get, another water park isn’t the worst thing in the world, especially if Kalahari builds up KD/BGW partnerships and provides shuttles to them.

Umm... That's one long shuttle trip to BGW from the proposed resort location. And I thought it'd be easier to drive directly to KD...

This resort isn't anywhere near a regional or major airport, so chances are unlikely that it's going to see a lot of guests from far out of the area that aren't going to have a vehicle.

Though, if they did do a shuttle an advantage is to not have to pay for parking.
 
Driving from Baltimore to Williamsburg last Wednesday wasn't bad in the late morning and early evening but other days it's complete hell. The thing I don't understand is even with little traffic on the highway, people prefer to drive in the left lane. I found myself in the right lane multiple times passing people in the left lanes which isn't safe. It seems these people are the biggest causes for traffic backups and accidents on the highway because they force fast moving traffic to slow down and pass on the right. It also results in cars weaving in and out of traffic to get around these moving traffic blockades. I did see a sign in DE on 95 that said "Camping is for parks, not the left lane". Not sure it helped.
There are a number of issues that create the traffic mess that is I-95 north of Spotsy...
1) Local Fredericksburg traffic crossing the river, which IS being addressed with the current roadwork. Traffic entering the highway northbound at Exit 130 will be forced to stay in local lanes until after Exit 133, and likewise traffic entering the highway southbound at Exit 133 will be forced to stay in local lanes until after Exit 130.
2) Hilly terrain, which results in passing traffic slowing down while going uphill in the left lane. Two reasons for this, which are people not speeding up to complete a pass, and trucks that lack the oomph to make it uphill at highway speeds. I-81 also has this problem, and that is why I usually stay in the right lane going uphill!
3) Lack of viable north-south alternatives. 17/29 are okay on the south end, but on the north end they both end up dumping you onto I-66. And 301 is okay in Virginia, but from La Plata, Maryland north it is stop and go, and going southbound results in a $6 toll.

As for the EZ Pass lanes, I am still dumbfounded that they built those as reversible lanes given the congestion that I-95 often sees in BOTH directions.

On the train front, efforts are being made to bring high speed rail between DC and Richmond, but Ashland / Hanover County is a big problem - Ashland doesn't want trains going 100 mph through the center of town, and Hanover County residents don't want a new high speed rail route cutting though their pastoral area. And unfortunately, the I-95 footprint in that area (Exit 84 - 92) is too small to accommodate rail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bill s and outhikn
As for the EZ Pass lanes, I am still dumbfounded that they built those as reversible lanes given the congestion that I-95 often sees in BOTH directions.
Doesn't make a damn bit of sense to me either. I practically have to plan my trips around those reversible lanes.

I agree with @CoasterAuditor completely. It makes me wonder if KD and BGW would have more customers if it wasn't for that parking lot of a highway.
 
Doesn't make a damn bit of sense to me either. I practically have to plan my trips around those reversible lanes.

I agree with @CoasterAuditor completely. It makes me wonder if KD and BGW would have more customers if it wasn't for that parking lot of a highway.
The reversible lanes were put in entirely to accommodate workers who commute to DC. Weekend travel and leisure travel were not even part of the consideration.
 
When I was in PA and there was talks of express lanes in some spots of highways, we mocked VA officials to their face over the way they did reversible on 95.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92ramsfan and EdK
The reversible lanes were put in entirely to accommodate workers who commute to DC. Weekend travel and leisure travel were not even part of the consideration.
And as a result any travel on I-95 for any reason should match that pattern as well if you'd like to reach your destination in a timely manner.
 
When I was in PA and there was talks of express lanes in some spots of highways, we mocked VA officials to their face over the way they did reversible on 95.
to be fair, the central lanes were reversible HOV 3+ lanes that were in operation since the 70's, and they're still free to use for HOV 3+ purposes
 
to be fair, the central lanes were reversible HOV 3+ lanes that were in operation since the 70's, and they're still free to use for HOV 3+ purposes

This expansion started a while ago and we were mocking them for putting money to that rather than fixing the 1 way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zachary
As for the EZ Pass lanes, I am still dumbfounded that they built those as reversible lanes given the congestion that I-95 often sees in BOTH directions.
Not to mention, other than during use for rush hours, more often than not they remain closed, rendering them useless at that point.
 
Doesn't make a damn bit of sense to me either. I practically have to plan my trips around those reversible lanes.

I agree with @CoasterAuditor completely. It makes me wonder if KD and BGW would have more customers if it wasn't for that parking lot of a highway.
So you're saying whenever we don't get a new roller coaster we should blame I-95? Fine with me lol.
 
Doesn't make a damn bit of sense to me either. I practically have to plan my trips around those reversible lanes.

I agree with @CoasterAuditor completely. It makes me wonder if KD and BGW would have more customers if it wasn't for that parking lot of a highway.
I would imagine this is true for Lake Anna, VA Beach, and any other tourist destinations that require traversing I-95. I know personally I make far fewer trips south of the beltway than I would if travel times were reliable, even if tolls were involved.
 
So you're saying whenever we don't get a new roller coaster we should blame I-95? Fine with me lol.
Don't forget 495. The entire highway system around here is enough of a reason to just stay home. But seriously, I wonder how many people have second thoughts about visiting those parks because of the traffic. I know it's deterred me a few times from going on a whim.
 
4 - In discussions with other people still in the planning field, we’ve come to the conclusion that VA’s 95/81/64 issues is the lack of major highways connecting in between those points. VA desperately needs alternative routes that connect E/W and NE/SW/SE/NW to cross the state. They need a highway going N/S through Charlottesville. The reason traffic stays on 95 is more that it’s the only way N/S along with 81. So traffic to get to middle parts of the states are pushed to them.
Things honestly would be a lot better had VDOT not refused to take part in the I-99 project. It was intended to run from NY (where it currently is marked "Future I99" through the current I99 in PA, and then continue down to Norfolk basically taking the path of US17. The would have taken so much traffic off of I-95 that currently runs on I70/I95.
 
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad