RE: FREE Admission for Kids 3 - 5 Years Old
Really great conversation in here... as a onetime kid, then as a no-kids ride warrior, and now as a parent with two younger kids, reading through all of this really reminds me of the reasons why Busch Gardens has been a special place to visit through the years. The park has had a great offering for me (and now my family) throughout that time, spanning from the mid-1980s through the present day.
The one gap I have been hoping to see the park address over the past 4-5 years has been between Grover and Verbolten/Loch Ness. It's a gap in thrill intensity but also in height restriction, spanning a not-insignificant amount of time in a kid's young life. It can affect enjoyability/perceptions during a family's entire trip (and therefore the odds that the family visits/returns) when one or more kids are too old for the kiddie ride but haven't aged into any other roller coasters just yet. IMO that gap, into which my kiddos fell for about 2-3 years, is now filled by InvadR -- at least on the thrill front (the height restriction is still almost 4'). Until now I would have considered it "fair" in a sense to have a slightly discounted -- not necessarily free -- admission for any age group whose 90th percentile height is below 48". That's roughly 6 years old for both girls and boys. From an attraction standpoint it might have made more sense to have the free admission for 5 and under until something like InvadR arrived.
But again, the park has the numbers that matter on hand -- and I don't.
To my mind, one outstanding question is where the park goes from here on the big-rides front. Is the recent focus on relatively smaller-scale coasters a matter of ongoing budget realities, primarily? Or would the park have opted for a compact thriller and a kid-compatible small wood coaster even under more permissive budget circumstances, to fill in a couple of perceived gaps in the offering slate for little ones? Does a focus on bringing in families via the 3-5-year-olds' free admission offer end up kneecapping the odds of unleashing a bigger ride by the end of the decade?
I am hoping there is the budget, will, and demographics support for a large, noteworthy roller coaster within the next 3-5 years. Piecing together my meager scraps of circumstantial info, I don't get the feeling that the pieces are necessarily there for that. But in my old-school opinion it is time to give the ride warriors, kids-at-heart, and just generally kid-unconstrained visitors something big to chew on and talk about for a long while. It also gives the little kids another big attraction to watch and look forward to. I'd like to write that on a survey at some point...