Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Wait Disney had 100,000+ N95 masks and just now donating? That’s like Facebooks HQ having 40,000 employees and having 750,000 N95 masks to donate and waiting to use them.
 
  • Eye-Roll
Reactions: Mushroom
Wait Disney had 100,000+ N95 masks and just now donating? That’s like Facebooks HQ having 40,000 employees and having 750,000 N95 masks to donate and waiting to use them.

In Disney's defense, they have a maintenance staff supporting a small city and probably go through N95 masks on a pretty regular schedule for all kinds of hazardous work.

This would be an indicator that Disney doesn't expect to re-open anytime soon, as masks are a necessary OSH item for a lot of work, and re-stocking may not be a quick turnaround.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ziva
Wait Disney had 100,000+ N95 masks and just now donating? That’s like Facebooks HQ having 40,000 employees and having 750,000 N95 masks to donate and waiting to use them.
In Disney's defense, they have a maintenance staff supporting a small city and probably go through N95 masks on a pretty regular schedule for all kinds of hazardous work.

This would be an indicator that Disney doesn't expect to re-open anytime soon, as masks are a necessary OSH item for a lot of work, and re-stocking may not be a quick turnaround.
It could also be that they purchased these masks in order to donate. I'm not sure that these are necessarily masks that they already had on hand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zachary and warfelg
Why is it unnecessary? This is a personal philosophy, but I don’t praise companies for doing action late even if it’s still needed. I’m sorry but I don’t think it’s unnecessary to ask “why the delay?”
 
Why is it unnecessary? This is a personal philosophy, but I don’t praise companies for doing action late even if it’s still needed. I’m sorry but I don’t think it’s unnecessary to ask “why the delay?”
And you don't know they're was a delay. They could have done it weeks ago but the site just caught wind of it. I'm sorry, but you made a judgement based on an assumption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zachary
And you don't know they're was a delay. They could have done it weeks ago but the site just caught wind of it. I'm sorry, but you made a judgement based on an assumption.

It's mostly likely very recent since most articles say states should be soon receiving the masks:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-n95-masks-to-new-york-california-and-florida
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...nate-100k-n95-masks-150k-rain-ponchos-to-help
https://nypost.com/2020/04/01/disney-parks-donate-over-100k-face-masks-to-fight-coronavirus/
 
Why is it unnecessary? This is a personal philosophy, but I don’t praise companies for doing action late even if it’s still needed. I’m sorry but I don’t think it’s unnecessary to ask “why the delay?”

Disney is under absolutely no obligation to anybody to donate supplies. They are an entertainment company. It's also not "late" when the supplies are just as vital now. The mere fact that they donated at all is something to be praised, especially at a time when we could really use some positive news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jeffh
Disney is under absolutely no obligation to anybody to donate supplies. They are an entertainment company. The mere fact that they donated at all is something to be praised, especially at a time when we could really use some positive news.

And that's fine. I said I'm glad they did. I'm still allowed to question why companies that had something desperately needed didn't act sooner though and I feel like I'm being chastised for having that opinion.
 
And that's fine. I said I'm glad they did. I'm still allowed to question why companies that had something desperately needed didn't act sooner though and I feel like I'm being chastised for having that opinion.

I just think it's a bad opinion. Disney's donation is every bit (100%) as effective now as it would have been in the past. In fact, as our supplies dwindle, I'd argue the donation is even more effective now. I think I would describe criticizing Disney for making an enormous, lifesaving donation later than some arbitrary deadline as "ungrateful'".
 
I had a longer response typed out but it's not really worth continuing to go on about. I've been now chastised for criticizing a delayed donation, and now called 'ungrateful' for criticizing holding onto much needed equipment.
 
I had a longer response typed out but it's not really worth continuing to go on about. I've been now chastised for criticizing a delayed donation, and now called 'ungrateful' for criticizing holding onto much needed equipment.

Where's the evidence that they held onto these? Maybe before assuming something, consider that there were probably some logistics to collecting the spare masks from the resorts to put the donation together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mushroom
While I don't think any donation can really be criticized, I don't believe @warfelg is being 'ungrateful' and he has his right to an opinion. I wish he provided a better argument for his opinion, but that's not really the point of my post.

It is clear enough that there are possible reasons why the donation may have happened well into the crisis versus towards the start. It is also very clear no one truly knows the specifics or logistics of when all this occurred as well.

That doesn't mean, attacking others because they believe a late donation is questionable is fair game.

Also, they donated rain ponchos too as protective equipment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ziva and Zachary
I wish he provided a better argument for his opinion

So what I had written out that I decided against was that I feel this way because my cousin works in NYC. Has been using the same mask weekly for 4 weeks now and it's not an N95 mask. He's been wearing a standard surgical mask, then doubling up with the previous weeks surgical mask. So when a place that shut down two weeks ago and the donation isn't there yet, it's frustrating to hear that from him, especially when it's been known for a while that supplies were short. On top of that, these 100,000 masks are being divided up between 3 states (California, Florida, New York), so there's a chance they still might not receive what they need. And I know Disney has little to do with that part of it, but it's just upsetting to think about that because this donation is happening after they've run out rather than before, not everyone that could use supplies are going to get them.
 
But if you're going to accuse Disney of purposely delaying the donation then the burden of proof is on you.

So prove it.

Otherwise, can you please just assume that Disney did their best to collect the masks and ship them off?
 
While I don't think any donation can really be criticized, I don't believe @warfelg is being 'ungrateful' and he has his right to an opinion. I wish he provided a better argument for his opinion, but that's not really the point of my post.

It is clear enough that there are possible reasons why the donation may have happened well into the crisis versus towards the start. It is also very clear no one truly knows the specifics or logistics of when all this occurred as well.

That doesn't mean, attacking others because they believe a late donation is questionable is fair game.

Also, they donated rain ponchos too as protective equipment.

There was no attack made, but I agree with your other points.
 
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad