Whew, a few things to unpack here:
@UncleDuncan the point
@Nibbins made is what I'm thinking too, and
@Zachary pointed out, the continuation of this event seems set on how well does it do for the park. As I type this
@Memles responded too, and paints the picture of how hard it is to really get something like this right.
Overall I think the post from FB
@Zachary put on here shows how shitty overall BGW is. They are so afraid of someone saying something bad about them or one family cancelling a pass because they don't get their way, that BGW is willing to break their own rules. That's what really pisses me off. They did this when they switched to memberships and then grandfathered passes because people complained because they would end up having to pay market rate rather than 1980's/1990's pricing. Then they did it AGAIN just ONE YEAR LATER when they changed their own price structure. Then it happened
AGAIN when now as a potential platinum member, I get the same exact benefits at $27/month that someone on a grandfathered pass that's been upgraded gets but paying only $12/month.
I mean, to me this is more the problematic horseshit from BGW/SEAS of being unable to draw a line in the sand and standing their ground than the limiting the number of members allowed a day to ensure this plan can help the bottom line a bit.
@WDWRLD The issues I see there is (1) Do you prorate the 2 months off when someone lets it expire and reps in March? Or do you up their monthly rate based on paying 12 months of the pass in 10 months? (2) The programing needed for 12 months of a membership is far easier than setting it up to recalculate amounts to pay and the mess that comes with that.