sunchild said:Why is everyone on Busch Gardens' facebook always so (agree)*angry. Is that normal for other parks?
sunchild said:Why is everyone on Busch Gardens' facebook always so (agree)*angry. Is that normal for other parks?
People are entitled to disagree but to argue with someone's opinion (the people who commented thought she looked Fiona) is infringing on their right of opinion. I'm just saying that everyone has a right to an uninfringed opinion.Peej1212 said:MadridBot said:First of all. I am “coaster_square”. That post was an inside joke about something that happened on Canada’s Wonderland instagram. It was supposed to be taken as a joke. The story is that there was a huge argument that occurred in the comment section of a job fair post by CW. It reached over 1000 comments which caused CW to delete the post. I didn’t want it deleted because of the content of the post. I love Busch just as much as you guys. Didn’t know that post would be taken with such backlash.
Unfortunately the problem with "Inside" jokes on the web is that no one understands them. :-/ And most times inside jokes are funny to normally only the person posting them lol. I think that something like trolling has the potential to go WAYYY wrong reallly fast. I hope that is not something that can come back to the forum here and cause any problems for the administrators here.
Yes they are entitled to their opinion but also are not others entitled to say that they disagree? Its like the saying goes opinions are like.....cspencer715 said:Pretzel Kaiser said:She is animated, that pic is just an actor they're going to have for promo.
Oh ok good, but even if was a joke or wasn’t, isnt everyone entitled to an opinion whether it be negative or positive?
Nicole said:I honestly don’t know where to begin; I just hope I have misunderstood your explanation.
First, you seem to be saying that you spammed BGW’s Instagram post about a new ride as some kind of joke.
Second, you seem to think causing that level of disruption to their site is in some way funny. I, personally, believe trolling like that is simply immature.
Finally, I am completely confused by your apparent logic. As I understand your post, you were unhappy that people spammed Canada’s Wonderland Instagram. Based on that, you thought it would be funny to do the same thing to a completely separate park with a wildly different set of guests, as a “joke.” While I know there are people who follow both accounts, the crossover is fairly limited, and it simply isn’t funny anyway.
MadridBot said:Who said I was unhappy with what happened with CW’s instagram.
MadridBot said:As far as I can see, those are made up words.
MadridBot said:Second of all, a comment section of a post is in noway “disrupting”. I am not placing a barrier in front of them that takes time to brake down. It had no affect on their progress as an account. So that’s false statement numero 2.
Zachary said:MadridBot said:Who said I was unhappy with what happened with CW’s instagram.
You should be unhappy that some poor social media manager had to deal with that extra strife during their workday and ultimately had to delete their work to fix the problem.
MadridBot said:As far as I can see, those are made up words.
I think most people would call that "being given the benefit of the doubt." You would have been wise to accept that gesture of goodwill.
MadridBot said:Second of all, a comment section of a post is in noway “disrupting”. I am not placing a barrier in front of them that takes time to brake down. It had no affect on their progress as an account. So that’s false statement numero 2.
You were apparently mirroring your actions on something that was done to Canada's Wonderland which was clearly disrupting and a barrier to the progression of their account. So much so in fact that CW had to take down the post.
Nicole said:My response was to your original post, not to the completely new version that is there now. I guess you rewrote it to remove the comments I cited.
MadridBot said:Nicole said:I honestly don’t know where to begin; I just hope I have misunderstood your explanation.
First, you seem to be saying that you spammed BGW’s Instagram post about a new ride as some kind of joke.
Second, you seem to think causing that level of disruption to their site is in some way funny. I, personally, believe trolling like that is simply immature.
Finally, I am completely confused by your apparent logic. As I understand your post, you were unhappy that people spammed Canada’s Wonderland Instagram. Based on that, you thought it would be funny to do the same thing to a completely separate park with a wildly different set of guests, as a “joke.” While I know there are people who follow both accounts, the crossover is fairly limited, and it simply isn’t funny anyway.
... I’m going to be honest. I’m really confused where you’re coming up with these things.
MadridBot said:I didn’t want it deleted because of the content of the post.
MadridBot said:That post was an inside joke about something that happened on Canada’s Wonderland instagram. It was supposed to be taken as a joke. The story is that there was a huge argument that occurred in the comment section of a job fair post by CW. It reached over 1000 comments which caused CW to delete the post.
Hate that this sort of toxic behavior is common in the fan community. That's why ai stay away from r/rollercoasters
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.