Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Gosh, Joel Mamby cannot come fast enough. There seems to be no amount of competent leadership, and professionalism in the company right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zachary
He is only one person. We need to hope that the BOD does not have him hamstrung and that he can do what he has done elsewhere. This level of incompetence is not one person, it is entire staffs. He is going to have to completely gut marketing and start over again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zachary
After seeing that awful anti-Sea World interview on the Daily Show recently, I saw my first Ask SeaWorld ad on the Daily Show last night.  I can't lie, it was decently done.  It was interesting that they don't show any shots with the whales in focus, only shots of two employees (a vet and rescuer) with whales in the background. I did feel like it got their message across in a straight-forward, simple point without getting bogged down in any negativity like the social media campaigns have been.  I'd give it a rare positive review compared to most of their efforts of late.  If they focus on simple positive messages like this, maybe they can start to make some progress on image rehabilitation.
 
Unfortunately, publicity and bandwagon has led to the growth of the ignorant vocal group. In reference to Ask SeaWorld, ParkFans keeps bitching about how they needed to combat Blackfish, and when they finally came up with this strategy, Zach says they should fail. How rude, because they need a strategy like this more than ever to silence the vocal group.

I want SeaWorld to get out this pit more than ever, so if you want to be negative about it and wish failure upon them, there's always the drama on Twitter and Instagram you can join.

I will always love and support SeaWorld as well as Busch Gardens, even if nobody else will.

Anyway, as Backlash goes, I'm not sure what Manby's strategy is, but I hope he has a good one
 
Character assassination isn't a professional game plan. It is a weak, hollow attempt at self defense that just makes everyone involved look bad. SeaWorld included.

If SeaWorld can't defend themselves effectively with raw data and facts, they will fail regardless. If they are going to fail, I'd rather them do so honorably- remaining a company I can stand behind till the end- not looking like some sort of angry teenager with nothing but slander on their side.

If SeaWorld can defend themselves effectively with raw data and facts, they had better get on it because they sure haven't pulled it off yet.
 
They're trying the best they can. We all know we can't run a corporation like you, Zach, but their self-defense is all they have. Despite what you want them to do in reference to their strategies, they're at least doing something about it instead of doing nothing like before. They haven't had their character assassinated, wounded is what I would call it

Also, they have certainly stated raw data as well as facts MULTIPLE times. I don't know what else you want from them
 
My comment was in regards to SeaWorld planning an aggressive character assassination campaign against John Hargrove accusing him of things that have absolutely nothing to do with SeaWorld or their whales. It's a red herring designed to take the public's eyes off of SeaWorld. The problem? It's completely transparent and everyone can see exactly what SeaWorld is attempting to do. That instantly backfires.

At the end of the day it's essentially blackmail. He said something they don't like so they are going to make him look like a racist. How about they address his claims point by point instead? This is just incredibly immature mudslinging on SEAS's part and it looks really, really bad.
 
Well, obviously he was being a racist prick, no doubt about that.

In regards to the defense, I've only seen the NAACP as well as Martin Luther King III come out and say that Hargrove was a racist.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't seen anything else about their so called "immature tactics". Their Ask SeaWorld thing fell through due to trolls, and the Hargrove thing they are passively combating.
 
Party Rocker said:
Question, how does a company improve it's image if most people refuse to believe anything they say?

I think PR raises a good point here. By reading comments on social media or talking with people, it seems like combating even the most blatant falsehood fails because people immediately dismiss any pro-SeaWorld fact as "lies." And when a large chunk of the public already finds you incredible, it is difficult to get them to believe the positive message about your company. You can push hard-hitting facts all day, and true as they might be, they serve no purpose if the public refuses to believe them.

I've seen people dismiss the rescues SeaWorld posts as part of their #365DaysOfRescue campaign as "staged" or "fake," and I've read comments under SeaWorld's "Truth Team" videos calling them "lies" or "bullshit". Indeed, it does seem frustrating to be making legitimate points but not have them go anywhere because people refuse to believe them.

I like using Superize Me-era McDonald's as a parallel to what SeaWorld is going through now. Following the film's 2004 release, vicious rumors swirled about the company, some true, some not. In address to the true rumors, the chain quickly worked to change what they could. For those that were false, they tried telling the public exactly that: that rumors X, Y, and Z were all untrue.

Are their chicken nuggets really made with "pink slime"? No, and that's a point they tried to make. But try telling that to people, and people respond, "Ha, you actually believe those lies?"

So McDonald's didn't just keep telling the public the truth, because that clearly wasn't working. They showed them the truth. Not uncommon were three-minute-long infomercial style commercials that demonstrated exactly how a McNugget was made. The company showed the public what they did. They put everything out in the open.

A very important step, in my eyes, is that they backed their info with universally credible sources. They supported their facts with FDA statements, government records, and research from well-known institutions. McDonald's made it clear to the public that they weren't making stuff up.

Most importantly, though, is that they took their initiative beyond just marketing. Marketing is an extremely important part of the process, yes. But you can only spin some things so far. Just because the nuggets aren't made of pink slime and the burger patties aren't pumped with chemicals, still doesn't mean eating at McDonald's is exactly healthy. That's what may people were stuck on. Indeed, it's difficult to distance yourself from the "unhealthy" label a film has given you when you're a burger-and-fry joint. So they didn't stop there. They worked to change their image- not just on paper, not just online- but within their restaurants. They lowered the caloric blow of their menu items, added salads and fresh produce, and in doing so, they could then market themselves as a changed company.

This is what SeaWorld needs to do. Don't mention Blackfish directly; let the film itself die off. Don't be rude to those who oppose you, because that will never inspire them to click through your turnstiles. Don't just tell people what you do; show them what you do. Set up webcams around the orca tanks so people can see that they aren't actually "torturing" the cetaceans (which, sadly, is a claim that appears frequently). Videotape and broadcast your rescues, emphasizing the return process. Show the public what you feed your animals. Document your veterinary care through video. Most importantly, back up your statements! A cruise around the NOAA's website shows that SeaWorld's claims are indeed credible. Tell the public that. They're more likely to believe the facts of a government agency than a company they already hate.

But, just like McDonald's, don't stop there. Improve your image within the gates. And this is where I think SeaWorld is doing a good job. People say the tanks are too small? Good, we're expanding them! People say taking orcas from the wild is wrong? Good thing we haven't done that in decades! Keep going, though. Stop doing the things that people use to argue against SeaWorld (because, unfortunately, not everything they do seems 100% right). Take away the material of the anti-SeaWorld crowd. Leave them with nothing to hold against you.

In summary, show, don't tell. Seeing is believing. And if there's something you'd rather the public not see, then you'd better change it.
 
It is also important to use the right tools. I am no expert on Twitter, but it is a format where control is non-existent. I am the IT manager for a company that has to carefully manage our image. Mistakes tend to make the press. I was tasked with creating a social media presence and encouraged to use Facebook and Twitter. I quickly noticed it was local media signing up for our Twitter account. I generally do not tweet. I have had a good experience with Facebook and there are controls in place if they are needed.
 
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad