SeaWorld files a complaint against the OSHA investigator for sharing confidential files and fraternizing with Blackfish creators which violate certain regulations. Full Article Here
Blackfish Backlash
- Thread starter Nicole
- Start date
What a strange way to phrase that. I can't believe they sent that to press with such wording without thinking it would cause some serious negative ramifications in the media. This makes SeaWorld sound opposed to animal rights, which is not true. It is true according to Blackfish, though. They just painted themselves in some really bad light. Why in the world would they said that?
OSHA protect the health and safety of 'Men and Women'...It would be against their rules, regulations, and organizational parameters to to act on the health and safety of 'animals'. This is what Sea World is accusing them of.
I understand what they actually mean, but surely you must agree that it sounds bad at first. Blackfish has proven that most of our nation lacks serious critical thinking skills, and most people won't read that sentence and think about the true meaning, they'll see "SeaWorld loves animals" and get upset.
As a company undergoing a trial by fire for accusations of treating animals poorly, you can't afford to word things like this. It will just make it look like the accusations against you are true to many people, which is not what they need.
As a company undergoing a trial by fire for accusations of treating animals poorly, you can't afford to word things like this. It will just make it look like the accusations against you are true to many people, which is not what they need.
I think it just goes to show how people care more about animals just because they think their cute, weak, and need our help. I really feel like the way they worded it is the straight truth with no deception, but because people care more about animals than themselves they see it as a problem.
I disagree. I think it is just bad writing, and even worse editing.
I think what they meant was that her actions were neither dispassionate nor objective, and demonstrated a sympathy towards the views and political agendas of activist groups that claim to work for "animal rights."
I think what they meant was that her actions were neither dispassionate nor objective, and demonstrated a sympathy towards the views and political agendas of activist groups that claim to work for "animal rights."
Yes Franco. I agree it could easily be taken out of context. By many 'common' people. The letter was not written for people that dont know or understand what is going on. It was written for team members of Seaworld. They probably dont care much about how commoners interpret the letter.
First rule we learn where I work: everything you write will be taken out of context and published on the front page of the Washington Post. Everything must stand alone up to media, public, and governmental scrutiny.
No responsible editor would have let that section go forward, especially in the media climate SWO is currently enduring.
No responsible editor would have let that section go forward, especially in the media climate SWO is currently enduring.
Mazakman said:
No actually the PDF file was the actual written complaint submitted to the government agency. The actual statement made in my post was all that was really meant for team members.
A recent bill has been introduced in California banning all Orcas from performing in shows, captive breeding, and the import/export of orcas. The lawmaker said he was inspired by the film Blackfish. However, Orcas can still be kept in tanks on display and then when possible retire to sea pens. Full Article Here
If this thing makes it alive, SeaWorld San Diego is screwed. It may possibly be the start of something bigger to. Hopefully this just blows over.
If this thing makes it alive, SeaWorld San Diego is screwed. It may possibly be the start of something bigger to. Hopefully this just blows over.
I have a bad feeling this thing may have a good chance of passing, from what I know about California.
Having them on display will make the orcas really feel neglected, and in-active. They won't really be able to interact with trainers, and they won't be able to excercise in a display case, and I can only imagine how much smaller the display space will be compared to the tanks currently there. I don't see how this helps the orcas at all...
One could argue that is not their Goal.
This is what happens with people who do not research or understand animals tries to "save them" based on an emotional and half-truth movie.
Peter R. said:
Agreed. I don't think most animal rights activists work to make the animals feel better; they work to make themselves feel better.
Peter R. said:
Hurt big business tactic. Nothing more.
So I just found this gem
TMZ Story
I doubt this will happen. She isn't actually a part of any team right now. And 115k is a lot of money for one race. Another thing is this really isn't NASCAR racing. It's another stock car series and not many people watch it. She's using this as a way to gain attention to her racing career. I work in this sport so I know how these things go.
TMZ Story
I doubt this will happen. She isn't actually a part of any team right now. And 115k is a lot of money for one race. Another thing is this really isn't NASCAR racing. It's another stock car series and not many people watch it. She's using this as a way to gain attention to her racing career. I work in this sport so I know how these things go.
Attachments
James said:
Really is annoying to see that. I have close ties to her. That race is going to be televised for ARCA which is why that was the one picked. ARCA races draw highest audiences on the Superspeedways. It is also the weekend of NASCAR running at 'Dega which will assist in views.
Lastly, it would be a WASTE marketing to a racing audience. Big business rules NASCAR alongside the working man.