That is what an agreement would be for...A legal battle with a nonprofit over a name isn’t a good look. And it’s petty.
And realistically could drag on right up to next years park opening-- better to do it now.A legal battle with a nonprofit over a name isn’t a good look. And it’s petty.
my frustration with this logic is that the nonprofit was the entity that made a fuss over a non-issue in the first place. They’d have a weak case in courtA legal battle with a nonprofit over a name isn’t a good look. And it’s petty.
Yep, especially with how Universal is marketing to families with their planned park in Texas and all they're doing in Florida to market to families. You want to have as good of an image as possible right now.It doesn’t matter which side created the dispute or what the likely outcome would be. A large corporation fighting a children’s non-profit for the right to use a name the non-profit trademarked first will never play well for the large corporation, especially when that corporation wants to use it for an amusement ride.
The colors are very uglyAre the colors growing on anyone? I was hoping that I’d see the vision once the entire park neared completion and I saw how it fit into its surroundings but I still find the yellow and green ugly. Black and white, black and grey, white and dark grey would have looked so much better.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.