It boggles the mind where Vekoma was (quality-wise) 10 years ago and where they are now.
How's the reliability so far on it?
Pretty good for a brand new piece of tech like this. I’ve been here all weekend (I’ll follow up with a full review later- simply a fantastic ride), it’s got stuck on the tilt section (while flat) a few times for a few minutes, then they’ll send a few empty cycles, then resume loading guests. Haven’t seen a major breakdown yet.How's the reliability so far on it?
On the flip side, given how unique, how new, and how prototype this coaster model is, there should be concerns. We don't know if it's mechanical failure or something else. The worst case is what if it's weight related with overall and balance creating this issue. Not only would that create issues with loading and unloading but there would always be fears of getting stuck in a position where you can't evac people.I wish the internet wouldn’t overly freak out over these incidents. Just allows for people who are scared of or even hate roller coasters to suggest they are unsafe instead of being concerned about actual problems in society.
I wish I could link a reference, but I cannot remember where I heard this, maybe an IAAPA interview or something? However, Vekoma brought the balancing issue up. On the prototype tower, they tested various scenarios to ensure they can always bring the track back to horizontal for evacuation.On the flip side, given how unique, how new, and how prototype this coaster model is, there should be concerns. We don't know if it's mechanical failure or something else. The worst case is what if it's weight related with overall and balance creating this issue. Not only would that create issues with loading and unloading but there would always be fears of getting stuck in a position where you can't evac people.
Yes, but this can be anything, most likely a PLC fault that maintenance can't clear quickly. New rides in general have higher evacs the first few years, especially if it's a prototype. I worked at Verbolten in 2013 and we still have over 20 evacs that I personally participated in. At least 10-20 more that I heard about but did not participate in. Got really good unlocking with the battery packs, got 3.5 trains with one, setting the record at the time, but that's a story for another time. Dont even get me started on how many evacs I had to do for Flume the year it got a controls upgrade...On the flip side, given how unique, how new, and how prototype this coaster model is, there should be concerns. We don't know if it's mechanical failure or something else. The worst case is what if it's weight related with overall and balance creating this issue. Not only would that create issues with loading and unloading but there would always be fears of getting stuck in a position where you can't evac people.
Hell, even new, non-complex rides have shutdowns that require Evacs. Or even rides that recieved a controls system upgrade—I was at BGW during the time Catapult received a new panel and as such, a new PLC/controls upgrade. It wasn’t uncommon for us to go down at least once or even twice a day due to the PLC throwing faults at us, something that didn’t happen prior to the controls upgrade. Regarding complex rides, Pantheon j think certain takes the cake for being one of the more problematic rides, though Pompeii also gives it a good run for its money.Point being, it's not surprising that such a complex ride would have shutdowns that results in evacs.
Anyone with a mechanical knowledge have any idea why they would tie down the front of the train for an evacuation? Also to say.... the maintenance guy sitting in front of the train. I would think the train would fall forwards than backwards?
Direct Link to Embedded Media Source
Anyone with a mechanical knowledge have any idea why they would tie down the front of the train for an evacuation? Also to say.... the maintenance guy sitting in front of the train. I would think the train would fall forwards than backwards?
Direct Link to Embedded Media Source
Very good point, I do remember now that Vekoma brakes fail open which would mean only the small set of drive tires are holding the train in place. I'm sure it's not seen in the video, but I would hope the back of the train is also tied down. The maintenance guy certainly isn't concerned given he's sitting in front of the trainIf the normal means to stop a train aren't sufficient enough to embark/disembark the train, it must be lashed as a primary or secondary hold.
If a train is valleyed, for instance, there's nothing to stop it from rolling when weight starts to shift which is unsafe in an evacuation scenario.
Regardless, it's generally a good maintenance practice to lash a train when you don't want it to move.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.