Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
I don’t know man… gut level, that first sheet specifically has me leaning towards real.

It clearly isn’t a final product set of plans that shows the exact fully engineered ride columns & supports, but I would not be surprised at all if this is some sort of real, mid-development plan.

Like note 2 says: “foundation LOCATIONS are final, but foundation SIZING is still in process.”
Whoever did this (assuming it’s fake) definitely knew what details to add in an attempt to make it seem real, but the labels in particular just do not look like they were done by a professional. Things like “existing parade route” and “indoor roller coaster” are phrases that sound like spending a thoosie would write rather than a real engineer. The scales are also very unusual numbers, and there are several labels that I’d expect to see but don’t, even accounting for the fact that these are not detail sheets
 
Whoever did this (assuming it’s fake) definitely knew what details to add in an attempt to make it seem real, but the labels in particular just do not look like they were done by a professional. Things like “existing parade route” and “indoor roller coaster” are phrases that sound like spending a thoosie would write rather than a real engineer.

The wording actually has me thinking it's legit.

My gut feeling is that this is real. Whether or not it's the final design, or one of a few they're considering? No idea.
 
Last edited:
Compare this directly to Orion- just look at how similar the station drawing is. The footings, transfer table & storage, the stairs... it is virtually identical.

SGFAM top, Orion below:
1763096249231.png
1763128876595.png

Specifically want to highlight the trademark "Tripod" support as the track enters the transfer table.

SFGAM, DOT R to L.
1763129257785.png

Orion, DOT L to R:
1763129325022.png

It's the same setup. Orion's is obviously the final, city-filed plans, so it has more detail (specifically the circles drawn inside the squares, outlining exactly where the footer is). I think this is just too much to fake to this degree...

how absurdly tight that far hammerhead turnaround is.
Counterpoint: Orion's turnaround.
1763129057165.png

Things like “existing parade route” and “existing indoor roller coaster” are phrases that sound like spending a thoosie would write rather than a real engineer.
As for this- Here's what the "real engineers" put on Orion's plans:
1763129828107.png 1763129884078.png
 
Someone also told me the idea of having the station be where Johnny Rockets currently occupies in Mardi Gras
Either you know someone who knows something, or you know someone who is good at making site plans.
Whoever did this (assuming it’s fake) definitely knew what details to add in an attempt to make it seem real, but the labels in particular just do not look like they were done by a professional. Things like “existing parade route” and “indoor roller coaster” are phrases that sound like spending a thoosie would write rather than a real engineer. The scales are also very unusual numbers, and there are several labels that I’d expect to see but don’t, even accounting for the fact that these are not detail sheets
Terms like "Existing X" are commonplace on site plans. It gives everyone reading the plan a better idea what they are looking at. Some of the people who will need use the plans may not be familiar with the park, so labeling some squiggly lines as "Existing Batman Roller Coaster" is critical.
The parade route is a critical piece of park infrastructure, complete with narrow gauge rails in the midway. It is more than two yellow lines painted on the ground.
As far as scale goes, there is not really a normal. 1" to 144' such an easy number to work with, 1" to 32', not so much (1" to 36" is much nicer). The part that surprises me is the one inch reference line is sized for normal letter sized paper, rather than large prints. That being said, stuff formatted for letter sized paper is easier for other people to print out to review.
My gut feeling is that this is real. Whether or not it's the final design, or one of a couple they're considering? No idea.
Assuming foundation sizing is being calculated right now, I suspect it is pretty far along in development. I doubt a foundation engineer would be contracted unless the project was green lighted. 2027 is definitely a possibility.
 
Last edited:
Counterpoint: Orion's turnaround.
Is there any reference point we could measure the turn on the Great America concept? My issue isn’t the shaping of it but the size of it. Orions turn is pretty massive compared to this one.
 
It would definitely be on the short side for a Giga but we've seen this with SFGAm before (Goliath in particular). Looks like the layout would focus a lot more on airtime (with the discussion that this is real. Leaks nowadays are getting harder to tell. I'm thinking back to Knott's....)

Project Rocket...replacing Johnny Rocket's?
I can see the homage to the former restaurant as well as corporate marketing leaking through here...."Johnny Rocket's: The Ride".

I know that you all will say that it's cheezy but...its better than the alternative of "Johnny's Rocket".
 
Either you know someone who knows something, or you know someone who is good at making site plans.

Terms like "Existing X" are commonplace on site plans. It gives everyone reading the plan a better idea what they are looking at. Some of the people who will need use the plans may not be familiar with the park, so labeling some squiggly lines as "Existing Batman Roller Coaster" is critical.
The parade route is a critical piece of park infrastructure, complete with narrow gauge rails in the midway. It is more than two yellow lines painted on the ground.
As far as scale goes, there is not really a normal. 1" to 144' such an easy number to work with, 1" to 32', not so much (1" to 36" is much nicer). The part that surprises me is the one inch reference line is sized for normal letter sized paper, rather than large prints. That being said, stuff formatted for letter sized paper is easier for other people to print out to review.

Assuming foundation sizing is being calculated right now, I suspect it is pretty far along in development. I doubt a foundation engineer would be contracted unless the project was green lighted. 2027 is definitely a possibility.
The guy who told me this has seen the plans and he’s not convinced these are the final designs. But, the theory also is that this has been moved up to 2027.

And I’m not gonna lie, I’d be pretty disappointed if the length was only 4100 feet.
 
Project Rocket...replacing Johnny Rocket's?
I can see the homage to the former restaurant as well as corporate marketing leaking through here...."Johnny Rocket's: The Ride".
If this is real, I think it would have a DC Comics name. They just need to move the DC Universe sign over to Superman and rename Big Easy Balloons and Roaring Rapids. This would contain all of the DC Comics stuff except for Justice League to one area of the park. Justice League could be redone at a later date to fit in with Southwest Territory or County Fair.
 
If this is real, I think it would have a DC Comics name. They just need to move the DC Universe sign over to Superman and rename Big Easy Balloons and Roaring Rapids. This would contain all of the DC Comics stuff except for Justice League to one area of the park. Justice League could be redone at a later date to fit in with Southwest Territory or County Fair.
Please No. No More DC Shit
 
Last edited:
I get that people don't like the DC stuff, but it does fix an issue people always bring up with this park. Superman and Dark Knight aren't going anywhere and feel out of place in their current location.
Who do you think they could theme this too?
If it has to be DC themed I’d rather this be a villain coaster (Mr. Freeze, Lex Luthor, The Riddler etc.) or a Green Lantern Coaster
 
I get that people don't like the DC stuff, but it does fix an issue people always bring up with this park. Superman and Dark Knight aren't going anywhere and feel out of place in their current location.

And, as much as I, too, don't want more DC, we should expect new Six Flags to experiment with the value of the IP by making some major IP-infused investments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaxxForceFan
And, as much as I, too, don't want more DC, we should expect new Six Flags to experiment with the value of the IP by making some major IP investments.
It could work, if they theme it to the right character. I don’t want them theming it to another cheesy hero like Wonder Woman, Supergirl or Cyborg.

I think a Giga Coaster should be named after a Villain I’m Ngl.


If they wanna do a hero. I’d love to see Green Lantern on this one
 
Last edited:
In my opinion the biggest issue with DC theming is how low effort a lot of it is, just slapping a superhero's name on a ride and putting a couple posters in the queue. If a Six Flags park received a DC coaster with Batman GCE level theming I'd be incredibly excited, and I'd like to think a project this major would have potential to at least be close to that.
 
The guy who told me this has seen the plans and he’s not convinced these are the final designs. But, the theory also is that this has been moved up to 2027.

And I’m not gonna lie, I’d be pretty disappointed if the length was only 4100 feet.
So the Giga is a for sure thing!? So whats up with them getting 2 big coasters in 2-3 years? Pretty unusual for any park...
 
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad