Can I still hope this addition won't be a 400 foot tall shuttle spinner? 

Do we know of any permits/dig tickets filed for Top Thrill 2’s spike structure when that was being built? If I had to guess, even if we won’t be seeing a spike, I feel a Mack tower coaster might follow a similar construction style with the foundation (specifically with the use of piles and large caissons).I can confirm that the boring being referenced is for the Ka site, not the Lantern plot or others.
Honestly, anything at this point is encouraging. The silence has made me feel like this won’t happen until 2027, whatever it ends up being.Do we know of any permits/dig tickets filed for Top Thrill 2’s spike structure when that was being built? If I had to guess, even if we won’t be seeing a spike, I feel a Mack tower coaster might follow a similar construction style with the foundation (specifically with the use of piles and large caissons).
Might do some rummaging. Could give us an indication of the progression of construction to expect if we’re seeing a large tower structure.
Honestly, anything at this point is encouraging. The silence has made me feel like this won’t happen until 2027, whatever it ends up being.
Thank you. I was also talking to a friend who works at the park and he was saying Ka’s footers were about 50ft. Decently could be them making sure that whatever they put there next can withstand.Yes, these are definitely firms that Great Adventure has a good working relationship with.
100 feet is extremely deep for just soil borings. Typical ride footers rarely go beyond 30–50 ft. I’d guess this isn’t for the ride foundation itself, but testing for soil bearing capacity, bedrock depth, or groundwater levels. In that case, 100 ft is common for this type of work, especially for a large tower that may require piles, caissons, or other types of deep foundations (such as for a Mack tower coaster)
The coordinates on the dig ticket also form a box covering over 2 square miles, which fully encompasses the entire Six Flags Great Adventure property (unfortunately they don’t point to the specific dig site).
As far as the bottom part that references Comcast, the “Clear/no conflict” indicates Comcast has no underground lines within the specified dig area that would be affected by the soil borings.
Good find!
Agreed. Thanks for the link! Looks like only Jersey Central Power & Light has marked interference with the boring operation, which is consistent with the red 3-phase electrical markings we’ve seen pop up near the site (assuming the boring operation this ticket references hasn’t occurred yet).Thank you. I was also talking to a friend who works at the park and he was saying Ka’s footers were about 50ft. Decently could be them making sure that whatever they put there next can withstand.
Also if anyone is interested this is the link where I found it
I am always surprised by what they can get away with for foundations in some parts of the country. Due to soil conditions in Gurnee, the largest caissons for Maxx Force go down 80 ft.100 feet is extremely deep for just soil borings. Typical ride footers rarely go beyond 30–50 ft. I’d guess this isn’t for the ride foundation itself, but testing for soil bearing capacity, bedrock depth, or groundwater levels. In that case, 100 ft is common for this type of work, especially for a large tower that may require piles, caissons, or other types of deep foundations (such as for a Mack tower coaster)
They just re-painted Nitro’s sign, so maybe?If the coaster truly is delayed to 2027, I hope they give this park a flat ride package next year along with the El Toro re-track. And for god sakes please repaint Nitro lol
that's a option if that mack spinning coaster got delayed to 2027 (I think is because six flags didn't want to make a kingda ka replacement announcement that seems too soon) (maybe if they gonna do a flat ride package similar to war on lines, maybe threw in vekoma tilt coaster in it)If the coaster truly is delayed to 2027, I hope they give this park a flat ride package next year along with the El Toro re-track. And for god sakes please repaint Nitro lol
I’m fairly certain I mentioned this already, but I do have a friend who used to work in PR for the park, now works elsewhere in the industry. He told me that he was hearing a rides package similar to Aeronautica was likely, I thought initially that was in combination with the 2026 launch coaster but it’s possible that plans have been delayed/changed and they’re doing a flat package in the meantime2026 is looking incredibly unlikely at this point, even if they're just being slow to get started we would've heard whispers or seen something by now. That leaves me with two questions, namely if the scope of the project is increasing, be it a longer layout or coming with ride package for 2027, and if they'll still reveal more about the ride this summer like was promised.
Thanks for the updates. This definitely sounds concerning, I think by this point it's probably more reasonable to assume it's been pushed out to 2027, even though we probably have the smallest window of hope still left for 2026.According to the FAA's pre-evaluation tool, a coaster over 200ft on the Ka site will require an FAA waiver. Per my searching, we still don't have one of those for this project yet either. That's super concerning given that "You must submit notice at least 45 days before the start of the proposed construction or alteration or the date an application for a construction permit is filed, whichever is earliest."
I am pretty sure Zumanjaro did operate a couple of days last year on days that Kingda Ka did not operate.But alas, as fate would have it, Zumanjaro had structural issues that prevented the ride from every reopening, and in order for Ka to pass inspections going into this season, that issue needed to be resolved.
Is that not the point of almost every ride ever built?only meant to be a money maker
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.