Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
It really depends I suppose. Theoretically, with this much supposed planning in place, the ride should have been bought a long time ago. Otherwise, it's a wing it type situation.

Let's say the rumor is true and the ride isn't so much of a problem as install costs, parts costs, etc. If that is really the case, track should be showing up any week and simply being stored by Great Adventure on premise until they figure out what to do next. They're not going to pay storage fees for a year while its delayed.

Either way, I dont see another package coming before the next coaster. They would sooner skip a year of investments.
This is definitely a wing it type situation. Closing Ka was a last minute decision.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: GoHokies87
If the coaster does get pushed back I think it’s more likely we see an aeronautica landing type ride package. A friend of mind works in the industry and used to be one of the main PR guys at Great Adventure. Last time I talked to him he mentioned that being a possibility as they prepare to basically gut the boardwalk. I really don’t know at this point though, that stockholder call was not very encouraging in terms of new investment. If we are getting a coaster next year, shipments should start arriving any day now.
Boardwalk might be gutted? That's definitely a noteworthy rumor, and one I hope turns into a reality lmao
 
This is definitely a wing it type situation. Closing Ka was a last minute decision.
If we really believe that to be the case, then they can only be replacing it with something off the shelf or a canceled ride from another park. I simply don't comprehend that anything could be going in next year at this point. It took two seasons to build a shuttle coaster. Unless the mack spinner concept is that simple to produce/copy/paste into any plot with minimum modifications.

This isn't even intended to sound like ranting, but there is 0 zero chance a delay is announced prior to next year's season passes going on sale. I haven't renewed in several years, but im thoroughly interested in the project from a discussion standpoint.
 
The speed of construction is, in large part, controlled by the price a park is willing to pay. We're still well outside of the window of time when SFGAdv would NEED to break ground on a new coaster designed to open by Summer 2026.

I'm not putting much credence into these delay rumors until there's either some evidence to work with or some bigger names start sharing the same, personally.
 
Someone on that page said that people from corporate had apparently been walking around that plot. Don’t know how accurate that info is but I do remember seeing some cars out there on Friday, didn’t think much of it.
 
It could be meaningless in terms of this ride's construction, but prior to my visit yesterday, I don't recall seeing this 3-phase electrical marking outside of where Green Lantern used to be.

1000014662.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: xenithwav
So I really don’t post here but I was doing some digging online the other day and found a one call in that was for 2/26 for soil boring 100ft. Don’t know if this is something they could be planning for the future. Also the engineering firm has worked with the park in the past on other projects. Don’t know if this would have to do with any future projects but seemed interesting.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5767.png
    IMG_5767.png
    265.6 KB · Views: 43
  • IMG_5768.png
    IMG_5768.png
    291.4 KB · Views: 47
Yes, these are definitely firms that Great Adventure has a good working relationship with.

100 feet is extremely deep for just soil borings. Typical ride footers rarely go beyond 30–50 ft. I’d guess this isn’t for the ride foundation itself, but testing for soil bearing capacity, bedrock depth, or groundwater levels. In that case, 100 ft is common for this type of work, especially for a large tower that may require piles, caissons, or other types of deep foundations (such as for a Mack tower coaster)

The coordinates on the dig ticket also form a box covering over 2 square miles, which fully encompasses the entire Six Flags Great Adventure property (unfortunately they don’t point to the specific dig site).

As far as the bottom part that references Comcast, the “Clear/no conflict” indicates Comcast has no underground lines within the specified dig area that would be affected by the soil borings.

Good find!
 
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad