Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!

Zachary

Administrator
Sep 23, 2009
20,581
80,271
280
Virginia
Earlier today /u/Live_Aioli9937 on /r/rollercoasters shared a screenshot of a Facebook group post about a new survey that has been circulated regarding potential Kentucky Kingdom additions. Reddit post in question can be found below.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Direct Link to Embedded Media Source

That said, the Reddit post above only shows two of the three options the original Facebook group post references so I went and did the awful task of actually joining a thoosie Facebook group (... /s?) to get the full info. Huge shout-out to Nick Spivak of the Kentucky Kingdom Season Passholders Facebook group for originally sharing the following images!

Indoor Family Wood Coaster​

FB_IMG_1760916207563.jpg FB_IMG_1760916209991.jpg

Indoor Spinning Wild Mouse Coaster​

FB_IMG_1760916211744.jpg FB_IMG_1760916213742.jpg

Indoor Compact Family Coaster​

FB_IMG_1760916215449.jpg FB_IMG_1760916217344.jpg

Lots of speculation that these concepts would take up home in the park's current 4D theater space. Seems like a killer swap to me.

Seen lots of interest in the indoor woodie which, for the record, I definitely share. That said, the third option (the one that didn't make it into the Reddit post) is super intriguing to me too. I have a big soft spot for spiral lifts and, judging by the Millennium Flyer pictured, maybe it could be a steel-tracked GCI with a spiral lift like Zambezi...? A spinning mouse isn't bad, but the other two options strike me as more intriguing for sure.
 
Last edited:
a indoor wooden roller coaster?, I don't know how that gonna work (unless they wanna make it like the Indiana beach ride)

but a indoor wild mouse or compact family coaster, now I can see that (since that building that 4d cinema took up was a indoor coaster)
 
The indoor wooden coaster concept- I wonder if that's a more strategic move that could involve the cannibalization of Kentucky Flyer? If this new coaster would be Gravity Group, I imagine they could immediately reuse the trains (a large expense) and maybe even some of the steel structure... but above all, it would allow them to undo the stupidity of the park layout/ride placement. If that's the case, I cast my vote for that.
 
Even if it doesn't cannibalize Kentucky Flyer directly, I'd like to see Kentucky Flyer effectively replaced with any of these options in the park's lineup.

Kentucky Kingdom is part of a sizable chain now. There are a number of Herschend Parks that could do with Kentucky Flyer being relocated to them as a small "new" coaster. Feels PERFECT for Wild Adventures, for instance.
 
Last edited:
Indoor wood coaster sounds LOUD. They really need to do something with Kentucky Flyer, good layout but so rattly. Maybe if it wasn't empty because no one can find it.

Most essential thing is to allow rerides again. To add walking around when the park is empty to all the other walking just to get to 5 coasters is cruel and inhuman.
 
Indoor wood coaster sounds LOUD. They really need to do something with Kentucky Flyer, good layout but so rattly. Maybe if it wasn't empty because no one can find it.
well, add new rides to the area around Kentucky flyer and maybe people can find it
 
well, add new rides to the area around Kentucky flyer and maybe people can find it

Adding more dry park investment behind the water park and picnic area would only worsen the problem.

If the road that bisects the park is actually slated for removal and if the park can justify the full demolition of the current picnic area (and construction of a new one to replace it elsewhere), MAYBE the current Kentucky Flyer location can be made reasonable.

That said, in my mind, it makes way more sense to invest in the improvement of the current, core park areas than it does to significantly expand the park to try to make the past mistakes functional.
 
Adding more dry park investment behind the water park and picnic area would only worsen the problem.

If the road that bisects the park is actually slated for removal and if the park can justify the full demolition of the current picnic area (and construction of a new one to replace it elsewhere), MAYBE the current Kentucky Flyer location can be made reasonable.

That said, in my mind, it makes way more sense to invest in the improvement of the current, core park areas than it does to significantly expand the park to try to make the past mistakes functional.
yeah, that what I thought, move the picnic area to somewhere else
 
Well the Spinning Mouse stats (1066') are a dead lock with Zamperla's Compact spinner model (Tidal Twist at Columbus Zoo), fitting perfectly within the building, so I'm assuming these are all real pitches.
Screen Shot 2025-10-21 at 10.47.42 AM.png

Given the stats of the woodie and generic steel coaster, they don't seem like production model layouts. Especially not with the latter seating 14 passengers, aka using single row cars. My educated guess is that the former pitch almost certainly came from Gravity Group (who else, really?) while RMC offered a slightly updated Wild Moose for the latter (the stats are very close). Of course that could always have come from Gerstlauer or Zamperla, amongst others.

The 5D Cinema seems like the right choice provided that they clear out the warehouse side of it, although you'd be surprised at how popular it still is. Check the local FB group at any given time and there's always solid chatter about the Cinema, doesn't really fit with Herschend's image but it would be missed.

A contact claimed awhile ago that there was an internal study about how feasible it'd be to relocate Kentucky Flyer within the park, and the results were as expected. They seem to like having the coaster and aren't in any hurry to remove it, but **** me that placement was Ed Hart just not caring.
 
Last edited:
Do you not remember reading the survey thread? You were a primary commenter. Surely you didn't just respond in it multiple times without an understanding of the material?

Kentucky Kingdom - Kentucky Kingdom Survey Polls Potential New Attraction Concepts

In fact, you even made some comments... The FIRST comment of yours after the original post said:
a indoor wooden roller coaster?, I don't know how that gonna work (unless they wanna make it like the Indiana beach ride)

but a indoor wild mouse or compact family coaster, now I can see that (since that building that 4d cinema took up was a indoor coaster)
You even analyzed all 3 options on the survey to an extent.

"Its pRoBaBlY a DaRk rIde"

There is absolutely no way @harry580 isn't a dedicated troll at this point.

I'll be honest, I've stopped visiting the site as often as I use to for this reason. Still frequent it, but how much more annoying can these dumb posts get?

I apologize for acting out of character but @harry580 you are a terrible troll. Someone needs to say it, and I know I'm not the only one to think it. How do I remember more of your own posts than you do? Because you just shit post all day long cluttering the fuck out of these forums.

Most of us want to talk about real shit. Seeing your dumb posts mixed between real posts that were made with some level of IQ will only ever get more annoying.

Please. Please stop.
1000004155.gif
 
Last edited:
Timidly raises hand The surveyed stats for the spinning mouse are a dead lock with Zamperla's more compact Twister model (Tidal Twist at Columbus Zoo), it could fit if they removed some back-of-house storage space. These have a few less turns than the usual layout and a different station placement;
1765138329010.png

I'd assume the other two are real pitches that were custom designed to occupy that volume.
 
SOMETHING NEW IS COMING
YOU CAN BET ON IT!

j2xhvvdb1y6h1.jpeg

Source: /r/rollercoasters post
 
I think a Wild Moose is a very likely explanation here given the seemingly-related recent survey and the fact that we know RMC sold one domestically. Regardless of the exact make and model, this will be a SUPER interesting project just based on the fact that it's going into an existing building and Herschend is gonna be able to hide construction so well. Definitely intrigued.

Also, zooming out, a huge land overhaul and then two back-to-back new family coasters is some REALLY impressive investment for a park that always saw pretty limited dollars previously. Hope Herschend is leaving some cash to pull off similar strategies at some former Palace parks in the years ahead.
 
I had a long theory supporting this on Coaster101 last month, you can read it here. A big part of the gist though is that I figured out all three pitched survey layouts (or similar) and they all roughly look like this;

1781446803646.png

Basically there's a lot we can infer about the project's parameters here, since Herschend was looking for a very specific brand of coaster. Dense, able to be built on an existing concrete pad indoors, and not from a premium manufacturer (cheaper and less development needed). That all means there's a higher probability of this being a Moose than a Mack or Intamin creation.

Another point I brought up is that RMC's Darren Torr said the sold Moose would be 1200-ish feet long and custom, while the survey said 1285 feet and with 14 passenger trains. Never mind that the lengths line up, but seven row trains means single row cars which is what the Moose has. So yeah I think we've nailed it down.
 
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad