Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Status
Not open for further replies.
View attachment 31989
I just took a new picture and realized the metal column is behind the concrete footer which does look very much like b&m

I’m not saying it’s not a b&m it could be, but I wouldn’t try to make any guesses as to manufacture off of footing type and anchor bolt lay out that as a ton more to do with the ground and underlying bedrock then it does with the steel structure on top. If I was going to take a stab at that I would do it more off of the plans and the collective lay out of all the footers more so.
 
I’m not saying it’s not a b&m it could be, but I wouldn’t try to make any guesses as to manufacture off of footing type and anchor bolt lay out that as a ton more to do with the ground and underlying bedrock then it does with the steel structure on top. If I was going to take a stab at that I would do it more off of the plans and the collective lay out of all the footers more so.
Lucky for you, the experts here already did that!
 
I’m not trying to knock anybody on anything I’m just saying last spring I did a job on the south side of Richmond and the footers we supplied were identical to that, but it was for an 55 foot elevated walk way around a soybean fermentation tank, I just don’t think a ton can be drawn form a single footer design, it’s an industry standard.
 
I’m not trying to knock anybody on anything I’m just saying last spring I did a job on the south side of Richmond and the footers we supplied were identical to that, but it was for an 55 foot elevated walk way around a soybean fermentation tank, I just don’t think a ton can be drawn form a single footer design, it’s an industry standard.

Good to point this sort of thing out. I'm guessing it's the laser focus on the new wing coaster construction progress that's caused a bit of blindness. For all we know, this foundation will be used for something other than supporting the coaster structure (possible, given the previous comments about the placement far outside of the submitted plans).
 
@Jwanger93 maybe I misunderstood you, but I interpreted your post as questioning whether that specific footer might not be a B&M footer. If that’s what you meant, I’m not sure why your post got so much hate because that seems like a fair ask to me. The footer’s location doesn’t seem to match up with any of the footers from the leaked blueprints; in fact, it seems completely outside the boundary of the ride’s leaked layout. And your personal experience with footers seems like good evidence that many manufacturers and hardware can use footers that look like that.

The footer strikes me as a bit of a mystery. Maybe it’s for theming or some other structure, for all we know. I think @Jwanger93 is perfectly valid in pushing on that.
 
This is probably a given but everyone one likes different things/ride experiences so... do you all think this will be the 3rd best in the park for you? and how do you think you're top 5 in the park will look like once you've ridden it.
 
This is probably a given but everyone one likes different things/ride experiences so... do you all think this will be the 3rd best in the park for you? and how do you think you're top 5 in the park will look like once you've ridden it.
This question is wholly dependent on theming. This coaster with Dominator theming probably puts it at 3-5. If the theming is good and it's a whole experience, it could be number 1. I weigh good theming pretty heavily
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad