Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Status
Not open for further replies.
so they likely had them hidden in hexcode or something like that so anyone inquiring would have to bother looking up the color codes.
 
RAL was the bane of my existence in scenic art. I had to do color conversions into the Rosco palette, (the most widely used scenic paint). (yes, the same Rosco that makes lighting gel)
 
I’m honestly kinda underwhelmed if it’s below 200 ft. Everyone had their hopes of this being a monster roller coaster, in typical Busch gardens fashion we get disappointment. What about the teaser on the train saying that griffon was the tallest coaster “for now”???
Employees on the train know no more than you and I and can and will say anything.
 
I’m honestly kinda underwhelmed if it’s below 200 ft. Everyone had their hopes of this being a monster roller coaster, in typical Busch gardens fashion we get disappointment. What about the teaser on the train saying that griffon was the tallest coaster “for now”???
Never trust the employees on the trams. One of them said that FF was like DaVincis cradle but went upside-down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ijerngvidsnvk
If you ask me, we are getting the 160' top hat and a 190' drop, more or less.

Just curious if trims would possibly play into the math to allow for a higher drop without going all I305 on riders? Or if they take a page from the curve on I305's first curve and play with elevation along with angles and roll pitch?

Thinking if they want the height and they want the curve at the bottom, there's only a few known practical ways to reduce the G forces on riders - I305 is a possible example to the same manufacturer on how to overcome the problem of a really tall drop with a large curve right after.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad