I am so glad you posted this @VonDerrick because it very much is in line with my non-posted-post (and where I got really mean). Other than SEAS saying "Yeah it's ours" there's a lot unknown about these slides.
Like:
When were they created? '18? '17? '16? There's no time stamp on there of when these slides were done. There's no reference to the time of year that they were produced.
How did they get out? Disgruntled ex-employee? Rogue employee trying to make a name for themselves? Planned leak from the company? This VERY much matters in terms of how it got out.
Why did they create them? Was this an internal pitch presentation from different employees in brainstorm mode? Was it a pitch with plans to current investors? Was it a plan to pitch some future investors?
Why are some of the slides better fleshed out and some bare bones? Seems like some random data points to have included, some strange descriptions of what they want, and the vagueness of them.
I think in the end other than them being confirmed as from SEAS there's 0 that can be taken from them, and the attachment to the slides has long been baffling to me because of all the questions surrounding them.
