What if the slide predates the height waiver. SEAS never said those slides were final or anything is factual. They just said yes we made those.
Project 2022: Pantheon
- Thread starter Shane
- Start date
- Status
What if the slide predates the height waiver. SEAS never said those slides were final or anything is factual. They just said yes we made those.
That's just my opinion. I recall people looking at the full release of slides and guessing they were from August-Sept. based on other parks and official announcements that came afterward. That period is after the waiver approval.
Again, it's just a guess/opinion like most of the posts in this thread. Tongue in cheek quoting Sgt. Hulka - "Lighten up, Francis".
That's just my opinion. I recall people looking at the full release of slides and guessing they were from August-Sept. based on other parks and official announcements that came afterward. That period is after the waiver approval.
Again, it's just a guess/opinion like most of the posts in this thread. Tongue in cheek quoting Sgt. Hulka - "Lighten up, Francis".
They were guessing because the picture was from Steel Vengence, which had been under construction for a year by then, which means that mock-up could have existed for 2-3 years before the public saw it.
Sorry not trying to be a stick in the mud or change your opinion, but there’s so much unknown about those slides other than SEAS saying that the sides were part of a presentation. Without any dates it’s hard to say.
I personally feel as though the cost of the height waivers, plus the FAA waiver not being rescinded makes it tougher to think the 315ft thing is something they moved on from. A spike shuttled launch sounds too much like Tempesto that I think the impact from it wouldn’t be big enough. And a multi launch low to the terrain coaster sounds too much like Bolt that I think the impact wouldn’t be that big either. That’s why I feel as though a traditional Giga could still very much be in the cards.
I personally feel as though the cost of the height waivers, plus the FAA waiver not being rescinded makes it tougher to think the 315ft thing is something they moved on from. A spike shuttled launch sounds too much like Tempesto that I think the impact from it wouldn’t be big enough. And a multi launch low to the terrain coaster sounds too much like Bolt that I think the impact wouldn’t be that big either. That’s why I feel as though a traditional Giga could still very much be in the cards.
Yeah I really don't see the space for a 300 foot drop there unless they go with a polar coaster.
There’s plenty of space. You would have to have to make the lift and drop steep like I305/Skyrush.
To me it looks like a reverse image of Expadition G-Force’s drop
Kentucky Kingdom’s 2020 coaster confirmed
It's a roller coaster from a mostly Planet Coaster channel.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLsSS21k0hsTpezP5ur4X3g
There are some problems with this article:
1. They confused the height waiver for Project Madrid with Finnegan’s Flyer. Project Madrid’s height waiver was for 315 ft, not 115; and it is is near neither Killarney nor Griffon.
2. The headline is simply false. They got approvals for encroachment into the Resource Protection Buffer Area. They have not yet gotten approval for the actual construction.
1. They confused the height waiver for Project Madrid with Finnegan’s Flyer. Project Madrid’s height waiver was for 315 ft, not 115; and it is is near neither Killarney nor Griffon.
2. The headline is simply false. They got approvals for encroachment into the Resource Protection Buffer Area. They have not yet gotten approval for the actual construction.
- Status