Project 2022: Pantheon

[b.mac]

If these were used as some sort of corporate finance approval power point with the planned additions for all the parks it makes me believe that these slides were rushed together.

Either that or the presenter was hoping he'd sway the big wigs with his eccentric enthusiasm.

 

[Coffee_Kreamer]

Seems like this twitter wants some attention.

I found it funny how he post that article from 2014 just to prove his credibility in the middle of the post

 

[madmax]

Thing is this isn’t just some NoLimits creation. It actually looks like something the park would put out.

 

[Ghost of Pretzel Kaiser]

A grainy photo of a poorly worded slide that looks incredibly causal for something that's supposed to be for corporate executives.

Not saying it's impossible to be real, but this deserves skepticism.

 

[Zachary]

Thing is this isn’t just some NoLimits creation. It actually looks like something the park would put out.

In all seriousness, how can you even tell at this resolution?

 

[madmax]

In all seriousness, how can you even tell at this resolution?

It’s not that grainy. You can make out elements and even the color to an extent.

 

[Icer]

It’s not that grainy. You can make out elements and even the color to an extent.

Yes, but I think he was referring to how one can tell if it is a mass-marketed simulator recreation or not

 

[warfelg]

Ugh. Call me driver of the skeptic bus. That’s just such a strange slide. And even though it’s a projection picture, most parks photoshop over a real picture from an angle. That’s some really bad photoshop picturing.

 

[madmax]

Yes, but I think he was referring to how one can tell if it is a mass-marketed simulator recreation or not

It includes the bridge

 

[Icer]

It includes the bridge

Someone could recreate it either roughly in the program or animate it in externally after

 

[Zimmy]

Ugh. Call me driver of the skeptic bus. That’s just such a strange slide. And even though it’s a projection picture, most parks photoshop over a real picture from an angle. That’s some really bad photoshop picturing.

No need to apologize for skepticism, especially in this thread. Never take anything on face value.

 

[Ziva]

taking a "picture" of a "presentation" is the oldest trick in the book

definitely fake

 

[madmax]

There is literally no reason for this to be fake

 

[GrandpaD]

I'll climb aboard the S.S. Skeptical. If it were "real" it was extremely early in the planning process. Maybe for an investor/analyst meeting. Probably conceptual, at best. In the RPA there's a tight turn near San Marco that I'd think you at least some track going there in the foreground. Also, the spire is extremely far away from the FAA application location and we've not seen any addendums.

 

[2muchpopcorn]

Call me an idiot but that spike (which looks to be the tallest point) looks to be Right next to Apollo's completely ignoring all the shops and rides in that area. I Could be wrong as is just a crappy quality image but its just my take

 

[DolphinzRock]

There is literally no reason for this to be fake

There is SOME reason.

 

[Coffee_Kreamer]

This is my theory on this PowerPoint somebody made it or had it and didn’t think much of it at all but then rmc Gwazi was confirmed and they were like “hey this thing might be true” and thats when the leak came out and was shared around because if one think is right why not the rest. It would explain why it might be an old concept of it is real or fake it still makes sense but then again this my theory problem and it’s wrong but we will never know.

 

[scottyholiday]

one thing that i've noticed looking at the slide is that the the water & "shore" areas do not look like busch gardens. it looks a little more rocky than i recall & the water looks more like an ocean with waves... rather than the rhine river (that i also NEVER see waves in).

 

[Icer]

There is literally no reason for this to be fake

This is just false, and tells me you haven't been reading replies at all if you don't see any slim chance for this to be fake

 

[Matt S B]

My confusion is in relation to the discrepancy between the height balloon over 300 feet and the type of model for this roller coaster. If this is in fact a launch shuttle roller coaster than what was the point of the 300 foot height balloon. Is it me or does something seem off? Can anyone explain this? Are the tweets legit?