This hasn't been widely talked about publicly but it's really relevant information to this question...Whether marketing will decide to again "take a risk" with sharing details about the ride in advance, and whether they intend to crowd source input like "Decide the Ride," as they did last year with InvadR. More a curiosity on whether the park viewed the InvadR experience as a net positive and worth repeating...
It's certainly possible that they will add some additional Killarney alterations later on down the line, but no one I've talked to and nothing I've seen has suggested that this project will expand beyond the front left corner of the hamlet.I am honestly curious if this truly is just an addition, or if we are going to see some existing things in Killarney impacted enough to where it is considered a loss of something, so minor as it may be.
I'll see if I can make impacts of the addition a bit clearer in my next article. Long story short though, it's impossible that a flat ride this large not leave quite a mark.How significant an impact will this have on the natural areas?
I don't recall a year were BGW and WCUSA both received new attraction in the same year before so I am not sure that there is any history to base an assertion one way or the other. All the adds I have seen including the in park ones at BGW only have WCUSA branding on them.I think it’s very obviously for both lol. Parks almost never do separate announcements for attractions in a year and there seems to be advertising for both.