Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Status
Not open for further replies.
For the record, if anyone would like to start a thread inquiring about how past leaks have been handled, what we typically do to evaluate the risks involved with leaked content, etc. by all means, do so. I'll try to answer the questions I can. It's a part of the process that, after tonight, I do think could probably use a bit more exposure.
 
Sadly, social media is never a safe place to post anything so recklessly as this picture was, because once it's on there, it really never comes down. Unfortunately, after a quick look at some hashtags, that picture is still alive and well online.
 
Zachary said:
For the record, if anyone would like to start a thread inquiring about how past leaks have been handled, what we typically do to evaluate the risks involved with leaked content, etc. by all means, do so. I'll try to answer the questions I can. It's a part of the process that, after tonight, I do think could probably use a bit more exposure.

As you have said so, and so it shall be done.
 
I've been off and on tracking this whole debate, but who mentioned anything about being "out to get BGWFans"??

Nobody is sitting here and complaining out of jealously?? Nobody is complaining that the picture was posted somewhere else first?? It's not even about who posted it first. This whole thing seems to be about when it was posted and how safe it is to post something like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zachary
Applesauce said:
I've been off and on tracking this whole debate, but who mentioned anything about being "out to get BGWFans"??

Nobody is sitting here and complaining out of jealously?? Nobody is complaining that the picture was posted somewhere else first?? It's not even about who posted it first. This whole thing seems to be about when it was posted and how safe it is to post something like that.

I don't know what it's about, he mentioned that he could have posted it earlier in the week. I don't even care about that, he should have just came to me and said "hey, you might want to take that down" instead of creating a big deal on this site.
 
I don't think Zachary created this extended debate. He posted his concerns and then responded to a series of comments. This firestorm seems like a group effort to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zachary
Nicole said:
I don't think Zachary created this extended debate.  He posted his concerns and then responded to a series of comments.  This firestorm seems like a group effort to me.

Not a group effort at all...I even messaged Zachary about it after he posted. He won't reply and talk to me about it. I'm not responsible for what anyone else posts.
 
Brian said:
I don't know what it's about, he mentioned that he could have posted it earlier in the week. I don't even care about that, he should have just came to me and said "hey, you might want to take that down" instead of creating a big deal on this site.
I don't pretend to know all of Zachary's motives for what he does. And to be honest, I completely missed the picture or whatever was posted just because I was at work. But, I do have some faith in what he says when it comes to sharing information which could hurt somebody's livelihood.

Could he have been nicer about it? Maybe? Probably? Not really? I don't know. Again, I'm missing the entire picture. The jist I have is somebody (You) posted a picture through another fansite, and said fansite is run by somebody who buttsheads a lot, or at the very least actively disagrees with Zachary, and thus isn't likely to listen to any sort of advice he has to offer.

I have no idea if the original post had a name attached to it, so he could privately say something to you. That's all a mystery to me. (And it doesn't need to go any further. I don't require an explanation.)

All I was saying, was nobody thinks anybody is out to get BGWFans, or any other site for that matter. It's not out of jealousy. It's out of safety for somebody's job.
 
Applesauce said:
Brian said:
I don't know what it's about, he mentioned that he could have posted it earlier in the week. I don't even care about that, he should have just came to me and said "hey, you might want to take that down" instead of creating a big deal on this site.
I don't pretend to know all of Zachary's motives for what he does. And to be honest, I completely missed the picture or whatever was posted just because I was at work. But, I do have some faith in what he says when it comes to sharing information which could hurt somebody's livelihood.

Could he have been nicer about it? Maybe? Probably? Not really? I don't know. Again, I'm missing the entire picture. The jist I have is somebody (You) posted a picture through another fansite, and said fansite is run by somebody who buttsheads a lot, or at the very least actively disagrees with Zachary, and thus isn't likely to listen to any sort of advice he has to offer.

I have no idea if the original post had a name attached to it, so he could privately say something to you. That's all a mystery to me. (And it doesn't need to go any further. I don't require an explanation.)

All I was saying, was nobody thinks anybody is out to get BGWFans, or any other site for that matter. It's not out of jealousy. It's out of safety for somebody's job.

I totally understand what you are saying. I'm sorry for any misunderstandings! Let's all just end it right here.
 
Tempesto has been the most dreaded park addition by many people so far. It has already received complaints of being a carbon copy coaster. However, the one key point is how will capacity and quick queue interact with the ride. It seems that you can only get a single quick queue for Tempesto by winning the new plinko game in Festa Italia. In the end, it seems quick queue may not really have the big effect on the ride’s capacity since you have to win it instead of buying it.

Another piece of news revolves around Pegasus Gifts. As I mentioned before, the shop will feature many anniversary gifts. However, the shop will also be re-themed and sell Tempesto gifts as well. There will be ceiling fans made of bike wheels.

The ride is based off of a bike-riding dare devil, Diavolo, who would ride a regular bike through loops as he traveled throughout the world. In order to travel around, he kept his bike in a wagon. This wagon will be one of the prominent theme features. You will also see another theme element that is a half of a loop with a bike on top of it.

Advertising for the ride will be based around calling all daredevils and daredevils wanted. I can also further confirm that the concept art BGWFans found earlier is indeed actual concept art that will be used in advertisements.
 
Yes I finally have understood the theme myself. For the longest time I was trying to find out who is the dare devil. But yes, Diavolo is the name of the dare devil and Tempesto is just an Italian word the park picked for the ride.
 
Based on the plans we saw, quite some time ago, they seem to look similar if not identical to the Full Trottle trains at Six Flags Magic Mountain. I would like to see a picture as well if available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peyton
Status
Not open for further replies.
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad