Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Anheuser Busch built Kingsmill Resort adjacent to the park and brewery for this exact purpose. Even though it's not connected anymore per say, they're still affiliated with Busch Gardens, act as the park hotel and shuttle to both bgw and wcusa.

What I've dreamed of is that SeaWorld purchase Kingsmill Resort next time it goes up for sale to make it truly connected again and use it as a full fledged Busch Gardens hotel and golf resort again.
 
I'd propose three options for SEAS in Williamsburg if they want to do this:

1 - As @Jonesta6 said, build it WCUSA and shuttle people over. The downside I see here is it makes it harder to do ERT or LRT for resort guests at BGW. Running shuttles that far all day is rather expensive. Additionally the routes are either 190 -> 60 or 190 -> 64; so if they wanted to avoid any traffic it would take building their own restricted access road. The reason why WDW/UO's shuttle systems work so well is they aren't regular public roads they are on. (And before people bring up Epic Universe, Universal is looking at making a private road and train system to take people back and forth). This would likely end up the most expensive option.

2 - Build in the Scotland overflow lot. Now with this plan you can do something really nice because you got a ton of land space. You down't have to make a taller building. Now I know everyone gives push back at the expense, but keep in mind the alternatives here, but they could turn Bavaria lot into a 3 story parking garage (and my dream with this would be covering the top with solar panels). But anyways, with this pan you can put a hotel, a restaurant to two, give some entertainment options, resort exclusive pool/lazy river/tube complex. Think something like UO's Cabana Bay resort. A cool option they could do here is a foot bridge over 60, to the England lot, to the space by COS; this is less than a 1/2 mile, and it could be a resort exclusive entrance/exit.

3 - Use the space between the England and France parking lots for a tower style hotel. There would be limited extras to put with this hotel (maybe a restaurant in the bottom floor, small pool) but building high tends to be expensive. This would also likely be the smallest hotel of the 3 options. Here, you make the England lot the hotel parking, turn France into the VIP lot, push busses to overflow OR build an extra lot at WCUSA to park busses in water they drop guests off.

Now, in options 2-3 you would still need to shuttle people to and from WCUSA, but there's a few reasons it's not as expensive:
- You could do much less frequent trips; going every 1/2 hour in the first and last two hours, hourly in between.
- They could encourage resort guests to drive themselves for freedom of coming and going, making certain sports exclusive to them (close to the gate)
- Keep the reservation system in place and have people schedule what days they want to do what so you can have shuttles scheduled on demand.

Now --
My reasons I would pick option #2:
~Being in the overflow lots it feels like a little separation from the park. It is one thing I like with WDW over UO is the feeling like when you are at your resort you are away from the park.
~Somewhat gives them the most space to do a true entertainment space so people that want a day off from the park can have it. It also gives something to do at night for families with younger kids that don't want to stay in the park that late. It's also an opportunity to do something on arrival day and departure day if you don't want to go to a park.
~Yes, we've had the parking garage argument a bunch, but with this plan you aren't taking away any at park parking, and don't need a huge infrastructure investment to shuttle people over or shuffling parking around. If you do a skywalk like UO has from the parking to CityWalk you could cut on how many shuttles are needed. Heck at that rate you could do a duel purpose automated tram or walk way.
~This last one might be one of the most important. By not building at the park, but keeping it closer to BGW than WCUSA, you can still do SPW with minimal impact. If you build at the park, using the England lot for the hotel, and you take France for SPW the only parking at the park is Ireland and Germany; and this would cause major ADA issues for BGW. If they build in overflow, and build SPW in France, you can shift all ADA capable spaces to England, charge a higher VIP England rate, use Germany for highest level memberships, Ireland as regular parking, and the new overflow garage as a budget option.
 
@warfelg, One variable to possibly consider with your plans. How do you alter them if BGW manages to get one of the new Sesame Place Park expansions?
 
Using SPW vice SPP abbreviation messed me up as I didn't pick up on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tursiops
RE: A Resort Hotel?

Don't see it happening for a number of reasons.

Seaworld and BGT are both smack in the middle of a area that wouldn't allow it. BGW doesn't have enough disposable land to accommodate it (Just because land is open around the park doesn't mean it is possible). The infrastructure portion would be crucial on the pocket.
Why couldn’t they do it in the England parking lot and add a parking garage as well?
 
Why couldn’t they do it in the England parking lot and add a parking garage as well?
England is very weird to every try a parking garage. Because of the weird terrain they have there trying make a parking garage in England would be far costlier than one in Bavaria.
 
Hot (?) take:
If they did a resort hotel it should be at WCUSA. They have more space to build out something more if it were to expand, there's plenty of space for a resort dedicated parking garage, and if they put it at the right spot they can use Hubba Hubba highway as the resort lazy river, putting a pool next to it and build out a new lazy river for the water park. Or they could use the current space near the employee parking as back of house for both the hotel and park and build out all new entertainment for the hotel.
 
If they built another lazy river, can they please make it like the crazy river at Atlantis in the Bahamas!?
 
Seems relevant.

 
Hot (?) take:
If they did a resort hotel it should be at WCUSA. They have more space to build out something more if it were to expand, there's plenty of space for a resort dedicated parking garage, and if they put it at the right spot they can use Hubba Hubba highway as the resort lazy river, putting a pool next to it and build out a new lazy river for the water park. Or they could use the current space near the employee parking as back of house for both the hotel and park and build out all new entertainment for the hotel.
hands.png
 
I'd think BGT would be more likely as well, less competition with existing resorts in the area.
I agree that Tampa would be the place to do it, given lack of resorts (other than Hard Rock Casino) and generally poor quality of nearby hotels. Perhaps the Northwest corner of the property? Every time I read Kumba, I am amazed at how much unused / underused space is on that portion of the property. And the resort would not only benefit BGT, but also USF to the north. Perhaps also add a monorail to the new Yuengling visitor center being built? :)
 
San Diego seems like it's pretty tight packed there, though they did have a concept at some point. The most logical by far are the Florida parks, but I really think Williamsburg would be next. There is enough stuff in the area to justify a resort stay. We're easy driving from many large cities. And honestly the area lacks in that type attraction. Great Wolf seems to do well, which makes me think BGW hotel could really do well too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coasternerd
San Diego seems like it's pretty tight packed there, though they did have a concept at some point. The most logical by far are the Florida parks, but I really think Williamsburg would be next. There is enough stuff in the area to justify a resort stay. We're easy driving from many large cities. And honestly the area lacks in that type attraction. Great Wolf seems to do well, which makes me think BGW hotel could really do well too.

The only upside is their attempt to go year-round, but I'd be curious what projected occupancy would be during the school year when it'd inherently be competing for out-of-state guests with other resorts around the country. And, unless they build another golf course and an indoor amusement or water park, I'm not sure there's much of a draw vs. going to one of the many local/chain hotels when it's cold outside and the park is either jam-packed with locals or is running limited operations.

Then I'd also wonder about their ability to continuously staff a resort here vs. one of the more touristy destination parks considering all of the concerns being mentioned about staffing at the park as-is (though I guess if they can get the migrant visa worker thing going again then this may be a non-issue)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coasternerd
I could see, on top of the additional entertainment and golf course deal, they do something similar to Disney/universal with early entry/late night rides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tursiops
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad