I think they will have to walk a line between safety and security with masks."might allow face coverings"
Uhh... might... allow...? Excuse me Universal, but maybe try requiring face masks...?
I think they will have to walk a line between safety and security with masks."might allow face coverings"
Uhh... might... allow...? Excuse me Universal, but maybe try requiring face masks...?
What stood out to me in that article is that they claim to need four to six weeks notice before they can open. That struck me as pretty grim to be honest... ?
What stood out to me in that article is that they claim to need four to six weeks notice before they can open. That struck me as pretty grim to be honest... ?
Might work out best for SEAS if they can out last their competitors while they're all closed.Just some food for thought that I was pondering this evening:
How risk averse do we think the chains are at this point? SEAS has already made it clear that they have enough money to make it for a long time with the current status quo. Does a chain in a position like that actually want to open ASAP? In my mind, if the lead time is ANYTHING like what Cedar Fair is claiming, it seems like a real financial risk to start that reopening process if there is still a notable chance of a sizable COVID-19 resurgence. Why risk a TON of capital on the reopening process mid-crisis? If things go wrong, all that the parks will have accomplished is burning through a bunch of the cash reserves they will need if this doesn't wrap up relatively quickly. I could see where a false start could be a real danger for the financial stability of these park chains. Is the possible reward of open-but-attendance-capped parks with much higher-than-normal operation costs even remotely proportional to the fiscal or public relations risks at play here?
Might work out best for SEAS if they can out last their competitors while they're all closed.
Sure, probably not great for us and I wouldn't want to see CF or SF go under but....
SEAS may not benefit from their competitors going under, but taking some of their competitor's subscription base during the crisis isn't a bad move.Personally, I don’t think SEAS would get much benefit if one of their competitors went under. The only park from either of those chains that really goes head-to-head with a SEAS park is KD, and that competition might even benefit BGW because we’ve seen the two parks use their proximity as leverage to market to out-of-state markets. Like you said, it would be shocking if any of the major chains don’t emerge from this crisis, so this point is probably (and hopefully) moot.
quillette.com
This is an interesting article evaluating super spreader events and what the most likely method of transmission is. Based on this article, large droplet expelled through coughing, loud talking, of shouting are the most common cause that's seen in super spreader events.
SEAS could take advantage of competitors by getting parts of their Sea World parks open. Sea World's animal exhibits are one of the easier things to open under social distancing orders as compared to rides heavy parks which need significant operational changes. Sea World could sell $20 tickets to visit the park's animal exhibits and include a snack, bottle of water, and a souvenir.
Governor Northam just announced during his briefing that Kings Dominion will have representation on the Task Force for reopening businesses in VA. I anticipate a list of task force members to be released after this briefing ends, but he did say that this task force will discuss what Phases 2 and 3 will look like in the Commonwealth.
Any comments of when this would happen or anything of that manner?
www.governor.virginia.gov
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.