TO be fair to Jonesta6, he wrote, "New Spain." "New Spain," historically, included territories of the Great Taco Belt, e.g. Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, and Honduras.
And FWIW, Taco Bell is really popular in Spain Spain.
I would rather encourage additions that actually make even a little sense with the theming of the park, rather than succumb to the fact that I like tacos and therefore will enjoy eating here. I feel a slight amount of borderline hypocrisy when people complain somewhere about the lack of cohesive theme for one thing but the minute tacos show up in Oktoberfest its like "oo tacos I like those."
I just wanna know the why. Why was this idea every proposed, and why was it ever acted upon. Sure it'll make money. Sure it'll entertain guests who like tacos. But this makes me wonder at what point even the slightest amount of theme continuity overrides the potential of earnings.
They also feed anyone with a large group like schools and even family reunions. Hell BGWfans could host a get together and eat food back there. They will serve you anything they serve in the park plus some other stuff they don't serve.Technically speaking, the tacos were in a non-theme area.
The black forest picnic area is where bgw feeds corporates having their summer family day events. So, on days when no corporate events are running if they want to use it to test new menu ideas etc, I don't see the issue with it. They have to test things somewhere..
They also feed anyone with a large group like schools and even family reunions. Hell BGWfans could host a get together and eat food back there. They will serve you anything they serve in the park plus some other stuff they don't serve.
Really it's for anyone with a large group of people (I think 40 is the minimum) who want to have a coordinated meal time and have everyone eat together.
I agree entirely. If they were testing something that could be added to the park, go for it. I don't see how tacos can be cohesively added. "New Spain" isn't acceptable to me, and I thought most of us agreed that New France is something that really shouldn't be here either, so why worsen that same trend of European hamlets that aren't European?
They also feed anyone with a large group like schools and even family reunions. Hell BGWfans could host a get together and eat food back there. They will serve you anything they serve in the park plus some other stuff they don't serve.
Really it's for anyone with a large group of people (I think 40 is the minimum) who want to have a coordinated meal time and have everyone eat together.
Again I'll point out that squires still sells hamburgers and cheese steaks in England. La Cucina for years used to sell fajita sandwiches and cheese steaks before they attempted the buffet that used to be there.
I'm not sure what your point is. Is it because the park is currently doing something like this, I should accept new versions of the same thing?Again I'll point out that squires still sells hamburgers and cheese steaks in England. La Cucina for years used to sell fajita sandwiches and cheese steaks before they attempted the buffet that used to be there.
That's my point. The park has been doing this for years in some areas. So this isn't a new concept. Personally I have no problem with the park having locations like this as long as they also have other locations that serve food more themed to the location.I'm not sure what your point is. Is it because the park is currently doing something like this, I should accept new versions of the same thing?
I'd rather voice my opinion against this very thing spreading throughout the park.
I understand. Like I said, does that mean I should just accept the new instances when I also reject the previous ones?That's my point. The park has been doing this for years in some areas. So this isn't a new concept.
I just wanna know the why. Why was this idea every proposed, and why was it ever acted upon. Sure it'll make money. Sure it'll entertain guests who like tacos. But this makes me wonder at what point even the slightest amount of theme continuity overrides the potential of earnings.
I suppose if you already rejects the other then no you shouldn't.I understand. Like I said, does that mean I should just accept the new instances when I also reject the previous ones?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.