I am going to take a likely unpopular stance.
I fully acknowledge that the coaster looks great, and by all accounts the experience is insane. That said, I simply can’t get past the multi-pronged insult to one of my home parks. CW couldn’t come up with anything other than a fully-derivative name and theme?
Everyone keeps calling it the “spiritual successor to Volcano.” It certainly looks as if it fits. The problem is that Volcano was at KD. What on earth is any attraction linked to it doing in Canada? To add insult to injury, the fact that it was built around an existing mountain and other rides makes it harder to believe that KD’s historic mountain had to be ripped down to make room for a new attraction. So, yeah. I’m already starting off a bit salty about this.
The first half of its uncreative name, “Alpen,” sounds a lot like another snow-covered mountain themed coaster at BGW. So, now they have picked a name for Volcano’s spiritual successor that seems like a copy of a ride at KD’s biggest competitor. Rude.
The second half of the dialed-in name makes one think of an amazing giga at Carowinds. About 15 years ago the local government offered tax breaks that resulted in Caro becoming the regional flagship park, leading to proportionally less investment in KD. So, this spiritual successor also harkens to a park that hurt KD financially. Also rude.
So, yeah. I am sure it is an absolutely fantastic ride. But I just can’t get that ashy taste out of my mouth.