Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Alpenghöst said:
Griffon had the best marketing of any BGW coaster.

Or pretty much any roller coaster built in the eastern seaboard. Even though it was the 400th anniversary of Jamestown, the ads for Griffon were much farther reaching than Jamestown's Anniversary was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CastleOSullivan
pandorazboxx said:
A statement that seems to pop up when attendance and roller coasters or other new rides are discussed: "Griffon drastically increased attendance in 2007".

I just wanted to point out that in 2007 was the 400th celebration of the founding of Jamestown settlement. There was a HUGE amount of people that visited the area for that. I will concede that a brand new coaster in the mid-atlantic gave BGW a bump in attendance, but I think the 400 year celebration had more to do with the 12.5% jump than just the coaster. Is it plausible?

The Jamestown celebration did help attendance but the large spike was mostly due to the fact that it had been 8 years since the last major roller coaster was installed at the park. The locals were itching for a big new coaster and the park also had marketed the coaster quite well. I met people from all over the NJ-PA-NY area that saw Griffon commercials in their hometowns. There was also heavy advertising in the DC/Baltimore corridor.
 
Unagi said:
The Jamestown celebration did help attendance but the large spike was mostly due to the fact that it had been 8 years since the last major roller coaster was installed at the park.  The locals were itching for a big new coaster and the park also had marketed the coaster quite well.  I met people from all over the NJ-PA-NY area that saw Griffon commercials in their hometowns.  There was also heavy advertising in the DC/Baltimore corridor.

Anything within a 300 mile radius of the park was advertised to about Griffon. The marketing campaign Busch used was only a few pegs short of what Disney does on a regular basis, it really shows just how far reaching Busch could've been if they kept the aggressive marketing instead of balking like they did with Verbolten.
 
That is a really good point, pandorazboxx.

If I remember correctly, there was a large state budget that went towards advertising local tourism for that year so Busch Gardens may have received additional funds.

If not, I know all of the local tourist sites saved HUGE budgets to promote during 2007 because the 400th anniversary was such a big deal. Busch may have had better advertisements that year, but I'm 98% positive the opening of Griffon was probably planned to occur around Jamestown in order to capture the same crowds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nicole
Party Rocker said:
So the Queen of England came to Williamsburg to ride Griffon. Didn't know she was a fan of coasters.

The Queen of England is quite the thrill seeker. I'm guessing you didn't see the opening of the London Olympics.

queen_parachuting.jpg
 
pandorazboxx said:
A statement that seems to pop up when attendance and roller coasters or other new rides are discussed: "Griffon drastically increased attendance in 2007".

I just wanted to point out that in 2007 was the 400th celebration of the founding of Jamestown settlement. There was a HUGE amount of people that visited the area for that. I will concede that a brand new coaster in the mid-atlantic gave BGW a bump in attendance, but I think the 400 year celebration had more to do with the 12.5% jump than just the coaster. Is it plausible?

I thought all the hype around the 400th was a huge flop?
 
The outcome to the area wasn't what they wanted it to be for the 400th anniversary. It was an improvement, but not much, and definitely not what they expected.
 
The anniversary wasn't as expected but it was a rather large increase to some area attractions. Paid visitation at Jamestown Settlement was up 53% over 2006 http://historyisfun.org/JYF-ATTENDANCE-SURPASSES-ONE-MILLION.htm. Also included in said article is the quote, “Inclusion of our message in collective local and state promotional efforts that reached a national audience was key,” Bak said. “The Foundation worked closely with area partners, including Colonial Williamsburg, Busch Gardens Europe and Historic Jamestowne, to encourage a longer length of stay by providing a number of cooperative ticket options to visit multiple attractions. Cooperative ticket sales accounted for about 20 percent of individual paid admissions.”

This article bemoans the attendance on Jamestown's 2007 culminating event, the May Anniversary Weekend while averring that overall attendance at Jamestown National Park was up 153% over the prior year as of the end of July http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2007/092007/09072007/314802. No actual attendance numbers are provided and I can not find any.

Colonial Williamsburg only showed an uptick of 5% in their paid attendance http://www.history.org/Foundation/Annualrpt07/index.cfm. As an apologia, the article says that true attendance at CW is difficult to tabulate due to being able to access the area/restaurants/shops without a ticket. They also state that night programs haven't been counted in admissions but will be henceforth. Additionally, with a multiple day ticket or annual pass CW can't seem to accurately account for attendance due to lack of a 'gate.'

I think, that while the anniversary wasn't as greatly attended as expected it seems clear that a large increase in tourism in the Williamsburg area happened that year. Griffon's advent and advertising surely helped the large surge in Busch's attendance but was probably also due to a concerted advertising effort by the local attractions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Username
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad