Safari is saying Facebook wants to use cookies on park fans to track me, so, no thanks. So I can't view all those pictures. Would someone willing to allow that provide all the pictures here?
Safari is saying Facebook wants to use cookies on park fans to track me, so, no thanks. So I can't view all those pictures. Would someone willing to allow that provide all the pictures here?
I'm always in the dark with the Facebook stuff too.... It gets blocked by tracking protection and I'm more than happy that it does.Safari is saying Facebook wants to use cookies on park fans to track me, so, no thanks. So I can't view all those pictures. Would someone willing to allow that provide all the pictures here?
Wait what does this meanSafari is saying Facebook wants to use cookies on park fans to track me, so, no thanks. So I can't view all those pictures. Would someone willing to allow that provide all the pictures here?
I'm always in the dark with the Facebook stuff too.... It gets blocked by tracking protection and I'm more than happy that it does.
You are welcome to click Allow.Eh - I think some of the cookie and ad block stuff is overblown marketing fodder that gets brought up when so-called consumer protection legislation such as GDPR (which generally isn't easily enforceable outside of the EU) or CCPA (which has seemed to have far more implications since most tech companies have bases in CA and would rather have a one-size-fits-all compliancy development mindset).
I'm curious what the real issue with 3rd party marketing cookies existing are - I'd think smart legislation would prevent tracking of PII without consent, but otherwise - why prevent a site publisher from earning more on higher priced ad auctions if they allow for these trackers to be used for targeted personalized ads?
And as a consumer, why does it matter if a company outwardly shows they know anything about your browsing history - especially with DSPs such as Facebook or Google, they're not always using any actual collected data anyways.
In the end, unless websites all start putting up paywalls to support themselves, as a consumer you're going to see ads - and from my experience there's a definite detrimental effect paywalls have had on sites that use them to restrict content.
So it’s safe to click allow?To derail this thread slightly more...cookies arent usually tracking any data that I'd consider sketchy...Typically they are used to save the state of webpages and make your overall experience much more user-friendly.
View attachment 26540
You are welcome to click Allow.![]()
So this was placed in this thread why…?Great! Now they just need to put the giant sign on the ride that’s supposed to
Be there so people can actually find it lol
Android user, so not usually requiring consent on most places I visit (though that's because I'm usually already a registered member).
Btw, my opinion comes from my professional experience if that wasn't obvious - so far I haven't seen any actual threats exploited via 3rd party cookies, just the potential for threats and/or load time bloat.
Some pretty simple ways around this though.. like, why not just run your browser in a sandbox in incognito through a VPN chain?
It's not about security threats, it's about privacy and the invasion of it. I'm ok with ads but I don't need creepy ads that predict my behavior. You can market to me based on a keyword of *that* search but you don't need to log it and keep a portfolio on where I go on the web which is exactly what third party cookies do.Android user, so not usually requiring consent on most places I visit (though that's because I'm usually already a registered member).
Btw, my opinion comes from my professional experience if that wasn't obvious - so far I haven't seen any actual threats exploited via 3rd party cookies, just the potential for threats and/or load time bloat.
Safari is saying Facebook wants to use cookies on park fans to track me, so, no thanks. So I can't view all those pictures. Would someone willing to allow that provide all the pictures here?
That's fine if this stuff is opt in but it's not. This is a slippery slope that ends by everyone suddenly going "how did we get here" after it's too late to reverse course. When you start really understanding how these things are affecting the world it's harder to appreciate those things as luxuries. Our political system alone is severely damaged by this tracking behavior as it deepens the divide between red and blue. The root of evil is still money but this is becoming a major tool in that arsenal.I know a lot of people feel super strongly about internet privacy, never understood it. I love it when technological advances show themselves by giving me super relevant ads, my phone automatically notifying me to leave 15 minutes earlier in the morning because there is an accident on the way to work, my calendar automatically storing reservations and tickets from scanning my email constantly, I love it all. I know some may not, but the more my tech can assist the better to me. Google runs half of my daily routines at this point, and most of them I didn't have to tell it to do. Really impressive how much these things can pick up if you let them.
That's fine if this stuff is opt in but it's not. This is a slippery slope that ends by everyone suddenly going "how did we get here" after it's too late to reverse course. When you start really understanding how these things are affecting the world it's harder to appreciate those things as luxuries. Our political system alone is severely damaged by this tracking behavior as it deepens the divide between red and blue. The root of evil is still money but this is becoming a major tool in that arsenal.
But, honestly.... I'm fine with it if it's opt in but, it's not.