Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Apr 17, 2017
693
1,274
210
I recognize that for being the most attended theme park on the planet, the Magic Kingdom in WDW has a lot to offer over its counterpart in Anaheim. It is the only Disney park I have ever been to and I have a strong attachment to it for all the memories I've had. With that being said, the charm of the park in certain areas and ride experiences seem to be overshadowed by those at Disneyland. In Anaheim, most of the major rides have well executed atmospheres and effects. I can't really say the same for Magic Kingdom. I'll use Big Thunder Mountain as an example. Compared to the one at Disneyland, a lot of the sound effects are of low quality and not working properly, the A-lift cavern is blandly lit and the sulfur pools barely have those color ripple effects, and of course there's barely anything happening in the C-lift tunnel. Not to mention that the train cars don't have textured looks to them. You can easily tell they're made of fiberglass or some other material. The same can be said for Space Mountain. In addition to the absolutely rickety track, the asteroid projections aren't executed well, and some of the lightning from the main lift bleeds into the rest of the dome. It also doesn't have effective seasonal overlays like Ghost Galaxy or Hyperspace Mountain.

A lot of this atmosphere manifests in Fantasyland. I don't know about the rest of you but the medieval tent style entrances to attractions feel out of place nowadays. It just doesn't feel the same as the quaint village environment in California. Peter Pan's Flight is another example of not being as great as at Disneyland; the lightning seems off to the point where you can see you're just in a show building. The soundtrack feels outdated and unmotivating as well. In Disneyland the lightning is super-focused, the audio is engaging, and I think there's more effects like projection mapping. The rest of the area that was expanded in 2012 does have some sense of an "enchanting" environment. But the attraction lineup is rather bland. You do have Little Mermaid and Seven Dwarf's Mine Train, but no Pinocchio's Daring Journey or Alice in Wonderland. Not to mention you have Mad Tea Party right by the Tomorrowland Speedway, and the Cheshire Cafe is - right across from Starlight Cafe!!!! Oh NO!!

My main point is that many signature elements at the Magic Kingdom that are staples of Disney Parks seem outdated. While they have added experiences that do have great immersion and technology, they don't use that to upkeep their classic attractions. Disneyland does great with keeping their attractions up to date with the use of cutting-edge effects and a saturated atmosphere. I don't want to say that Magic Kingdom is a bad park. In fact it has a lot of great advantages over Disneyland like the beautiful vista of Big Thunder Mountain looming over the river, and their Splash Mountain has a lot more to it than in California. Cinderella Castle is absolutely iconic and stands tall above Main Street, unlike the smaller Sleeping Beauty Castle. But I do think Magic Kingdom has flaws. I wonder why they don't update their attractions the way Disneyland updates theirs. Keep in mind that I last visited Disney in 2014, so I'd probably have to go in person to see what the park quality is truly like.
 
Wait, so let me get this straight. You're comparing a park you haven't been to in a decade to a park you've never been to?
Absolutely. I still have the memory of the last time I rode Big Thunder in ‘14 and the earthquake tunnel did not look good in my opinion. Not to mention that I’ve been watching videos of major attractions at both parks since I was much younger, giving me time to notice atmospheric differences in both versions.

But the main point is though, Magic Kingdom never seems to refurbish major rides like Big Thunder, Peter Pan, and Space Mountain, in the same way that Disneyland has done so (the actual RIDE experiences, not the queue line). Space and Thunder in California look like very fresh experiences after their refurbs in 2005 and 2014 respectively. And the Fantasyland dark rides also received updates with neat special effects. This isn’t judging solely from my experience though. I’ve noticed many theme park fans saying that those rides at Disneyland are superior experiences to their variants at Disney World, and it’s no doubt because of the higher levels of atmosphere and effects. Also let me get this straight: your one reply to my OP is only referring to a single line of my original post?
 
To be fair, that single line was the biggest head-scratcher in the original post.

But I don't have a strong opinion about the MK vs. DL charm comparison, as I find both parks to be overcrowded chores most of the time.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Mamunia and Nicole
To be fair, that single line was the biggest head-scratcher in the original post.

But I don't have a strong opinion about the MK vs. DL charm comparison, as I find both parks to be overcrowded chores most of the time.
Well then that's you're opinion then. No problem.

But why are people supporting posts questioning a small part of mine when I'm genuinely trying to see what everyone thinks of the quality of certain attractions at Magic Kingdom and my reply explaining everything gets a dislike? Pretty judgmental in my opinion.
 
But why are people supporting posts questioning a small part of mine when I'm genuinely trying to see what everyone thinks of the quality of certain attractions at Magic Kingdom and my reply explaining everything gets a dislike? Pretty judgmental in my opinion.

Possibly because the thread was titled “The State of the Park,” which is ostensibly a discussion of the current state of the park, but the only substantiation of the claims in the OP is anecdotes from a single visit almost 10 years ago. The “state of the park” could have changed a great deal since then.

I am also a little puzzled by the comparison to Disneyland, which you say you’ve never visited. Having visited both parks within the past few years, I’m of the opinion that the “state” of both parks is fairly comparable. Disneyland has its own flaws too — including broken ride effects and outdated areas — that might not be easy to determine from watching YouTube videos.

I don’t think anybody has anything against you @cschnizer — I appreciate you taking the initiative to start a new conversation — but I think a few eyebrows may have been raised because of the way the conversation was framed.
 
Last edited:
I would argue that WDW has done a lot at Magic Kingdom. Off the top of my head:
- They are currently adding the Hatbox Ghost to Haunted Mansion;
- The renovated Cinderella Castle;
- The are retheming Splash Mountain;
- They fixed the PeopleMover;
- They are about to renovate Space Mountain; and
- They have overlays and modifications for attractions like Pirates of the Caribbean and Space Mountain for their holiday events.

I am not saying that they couldn't do more or that they are particularly fast, when then do try to add or update attractions. But I think that they should be given credit for what they have and are doing.

I can't compare MK to Disneyland, because I have never been there. (My trips to LA are usually to visit friends and we like to go to museums.)
 
Last edited:
I think the other part that impact MK vs DL is the size of the resort. DL has basically the 1 hotel, the Downtown Disney, DL, and CA. So DL and CA constantly need new attractions and upkeep because of this.

Frankly MK shouldn’t get as many updates because EPCOT, Hollywood Studios, Animal Kingdom, Blizzard Beach, Typhoon Lagood, and countless resorts need constant attention. In fact with WDW I do feel like a visit 1 time every 10 years is enough because of construction timelines and the rotation of working on each park.

I’ll be at WDW in a year so really looking forward to it. But @Nicole - they are about to renovate Space Mountain?!? I didn’t know that, and now I’m sad. That was my first coaster and I was looking forward to riding it with the future nieces and nephews.
 
I’ll be at WDW in a year so really looking forward to it. But @Nicole - they are about to renovate Space Mountain?!? I didn’t know that, and now I’m sad. That was my first coaster and I was looking forward to riding it with the future nieces and nephews.

The ride has gotten pretty rough. I rode it in the dark last year for the Halloween event and that was brutal. Just my own opinion though.
 
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad